Page 37 - BANKING FINANCE OCTOBER 2021
P. 37

ARTICLE

                                                              the sale of secured asset consequent to taking over
                                                              possession (symbolic or physical as the case may be), is no
                                                              doubt required to give a notice of 30 days for sale of the
                                                              immovable asset as per Sub-rule (6) of Rule 8. However,
                                                              there is nothing in the Rules, either express or implied, to
                                                              take the view that a public notice Under Sub-rule (6) of Rule
                                                              8 must be issued only after the expiry of 30 days from
                                                              issuance of individual notice by the authorised officer to the
                                                              borrower about the intention to sell the immovable secured
                                                              asset. In other words, it is permissible to simultaneously
         borrower is necessary to sell the property at below the  issue notice to the borrower about the intention to sell the
         Reserve Price.                                       secured assets and also to issue a public notice for sale of
                                                              such secured asset by inviting tenders from the public or by
         Rule 8 (6) provides for issuing of notice of sale informing the  holding public auction. The only restriction is to give thirty
         borrower of intended sale of the property. As per Rule 9(1),  days' time gap between such notice and the date of sale of
         if such sale is first time, 30 days notice, and 15 days notice,  the immovable secured asset."
         where auction is required to be conducted again due to
         failure of first auction, is required to be given to the  Therefore, Banks could issue simultaneous notice to the
         borrower.   Since Sub-rule (5) has been inserted in Rule 3  borrower in compliance of Rule 8(6) and publishing of sale
         whereby attention of the borrower is invited to the Section  notice in newspapers for sale of the property.  Parliament
         13(8) of the Act as to the time available to redeem the  had amended Section 13(8) of the Act, w.e.f. 01.9.2016 to
         secured assets in the demand notice itself, the requirement  restrict the right of redemption only till publication of the
         as to issue of notice once again to the borrower may be  sale notice as there have been instances where the
         superfluous.  (Section 13(8) restricts the right of redemption  borrowers had come forward to pay the  dues even after
         only till publication of sale notice). Further, the formats of  conclusion of sale and the courts have allowed them to
         Panchnama [Appendix I] and Possession Notice [Appendix IV]  redeem the secured asset even after issuance of sale
         have also been amended w.e.f. 4.11.2016 to provide a notice  certificate.  However, this amendment has caused confusion
         therein to the borrower as under:                    as Rule 8(6) of the Rules has not been amended.

         "The borrower's attention is invited to provisions of sub-  A combined reading of amended Section 13(8) and Rule 8(6)
         section (8) of Section 13 of the Act, in respect of the time  appears to be that Bank has to issue 30 days notice before
         available, to redeem the secured assets".            sale of the property and only after the said 30 days that the
                                                              Bank could publish sale notice in newspapers for sale of the
         Since the borrower is aware of the impending action by way  property nullifying the effect of the benefit of the above said
         of demand notice and possession notice, there is no reason  Supreme Court. But, the Proviso to Rule 8(6) of the rules
         as to why such notice is required to be given to the borrower  have been amended, w.e.f. 18.10.2018, and inserted a
         once again at the stage of sale as it would delay the recovery  format, Appendix IVA, for publication of sale notice (hitherto
         action of the banks.  Further, since these rules have been  there was no standard format for the sale notice).
         held to be mandatory, any lapse in observance of these pre-  Therefore, any sale notice has to be published in the same
         requisites would render the action of the banks invalid.  format which reads as under:

         In the case of Canara Bank v. M. Amarender Reddy and Anr.,  "Notice is hereby given to the public in general and in
         [(2017) 4 SCC 735], Supreme Court held as under, by its order  particular to the borrowers and guarantors"
         dated 01.11.2018, approving the action of the Bank to issue
         simultaneous notice to the Borrower and publication of the  This is a sufficient notice to the borrower to redeem the
         Sale notice in newspapers.                           secured assets and there is no need for a separate notice
                                                              once again for 30 days or 15 days.  Therefore, it appears
         "14. The secured creditor, after it decides to proceed with  from the above said amendments, it appears that the


            BANKING FINANCE |                                                             OCTOBER | 2021 | 37
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42