Page 15 - BANKING FINANCE FEBRUARY 2016 ONLINE
P. 15

LEGAL UPDATE

PAN number is a must                       Company has no power over property under

for transaction over Rs 2                  Securitisation Act

lakh                                       The Bombay High Court has differed          der the Securitisation Act was situated
                                           from the Delhi high court view in the       in Gujarat. Their view was that the tri-
The Centre has made it mandatory           matter of jurisdiction of the Debt Re-      bunal in that state will have jurisdiction.
                            for the buyer  covery Tribunal where a dis-
                            of any goods   pute under the Securitisation                           The Bombay High Court re-
                            or service to  Act is involved.                                        versed that position and ruled
                            produce a                                                              that the Mumbai tribunal
                            PAN card for   In the case of GSL India Ltd vs                         could deal with the matter.
                            cash transac-  Asset Reconstruction (India)
                                           Ltd, the debt recovery tribu-                           Its interpretation of the pro-
tions of more than Rs 2 lakh which         nal and the appellate tribunal in                       visions of the Debt Recovery
also including gold jewellery.             Mumbai had rejected the application of      Act, the Recovery of Debts due to Banks
                                           GSL India, maintaining that the com-        and the Securitisation Act differed from
"If you transact in cash for more than     pany had no jurisdiction in the matter      that of a full bench decision of the Delhi
Rs 2 lakh, a PAN number will be nec-       as the property under proceedings un-       High Court, which is applicable in Delhi
essary," Jaitley told legislators in Par-                                              jurisdiction.
liament.
                                           Lumpsum compensation for trademark violation
The decision to raise the threshold to
Rs 2 lakh was taken after several rep-     In a trade mark case, the Delhi High        plates, stickers, grip covers, ignition
resentations from central and state        Court has ruled if the financial loss suf-  switch plates and mud flaps using the
legislators and trade associations         fered by the alleged victim of the in-      same or deceptively similar names and
who felt that a lower threshold            fringement finds that
would dent consumer spending.              he/she had suffered                                          designs registered by it.
                                           more than earlier esti-                                      Further investigation
PAN is an alphanumeric identity that       mated, the litigant can                                      showed that the real
taxpayers need to quote when they          amend the petition and                                       damage was much
file their returns.                        ask for a higher com-                                        higher and, therefore, it
                                           pensation. In the case,                                      sought to amend the
But the new rules will be a blow to        Eicher Motor Ltd vs Saurabh Katar, the                       demand raising it to Rs
buyers of jewellery who did not have       manufacturer of Royal Enfield, Bullet       1 crore.
to furnish their PAN cards for cash-       and other vehicles with registered
based purchases worth less than Rs         trademarks had moved the court seek-        The high court permitted its observing
5 lakh.                                    ing compensation amounting to Rs 21         that normally such the prayer should
                                           lakh.                                       be granted unless it changed the na-
Rajiv Babbar, CEO of Rose Jewels                                                       ture of the suit or some prejudice is
alerted that sales would fall consid-      Eicher alleged that a rival firm was        caused to the opposite party. The high
erably as a large chunk of the money       found selling through websites its vari-    court does not look into the bonafides
circulated in the market comes from        ous products like mudguard, number          of the request; it is for the trial court
farmers and non-working ladies who                                                     to go into the merits of the case.
save money from household incomes.
                                           Cold rolling is manufacturing: SC
The move is designed to crack down
on black money transactions in the                              The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal of Gujarat Indus-
country. Earlier, the rules mandated                            tries Ltd against the ruling of the Custom Excise & Service Tax
that the PAN number had to be fur-                              Appellate Tribunal that the process of cold-rolling on hot-rolled
nished for any cash deposit above Rs                            stainless steel pattas undertaken by the firm on job work basis
50,000. The change is aimed at en-                              attracted levy as it involved manufacturing. It rejected the
couraging post office deposits that                             contention of the firm that no new commercially identifiable
have steadily declined in the recent                            commodity came into existence by the process.
past.

BANKING FINANCE |                                                                      FEBRUARY | 2016 | 15

Copyright@ The Insurance Times. 09883398055 / 09883380339
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20