Page 246 - Microsoft Word - Belicena respaldo

The concept «law of the nature» that I have exposed is modern and aims to «control» the
phenomenon before to explain it, following the actual tendency that subordinates the scientific
to the technologic. So, we have phenomenons «governed» by eminent laws that are not only
accepted as determinants, but they are also incorporated indissolubly to the own phenomenon,
forgetting, or merely ignoring, that it treats about rational quantifications. That happens, for
example, when it is perceived the phenomenon of a falling object and it is affirmed that it
occurred because «the law of gravity acted». Here the «gravity law» is eminent, and even if «it is
known the existence of other laws» which «also intervene but in a lesser intensity», it is blindly
believed that the reason of its fall responds to Newton's Law and that this «Law of the Nature»
has been the cause of its displacement. However the concrete fact is that the phenomenon
doesn't responds to any eminent law. The phenomenon only occurs and there is nothing on
it that intentionally aims to a law of the nature, and even less to an eminent law. The
phenomenon is an inseparable part of a totality which is called «the reality» or «the world» and
which includes, in that character, all the phenomenons, that have taken and will take place. For
that reason in the reality the phenomenons just occur, after, perhaps, to some already
occurred, or simultaneously to other similars. The phenomenon is just a part of that
«phenomenic reality» that never loses the character of totality: of a reality that it is not
expressed in terms of cause and effect to sustain the phenomenon; finally, of a reality in which
the phenomenons occur independently of if its occurrence is meaningful or not for an observer
and if it comply or not with eminent laws.

Before we treat the problem of the «preeminence of the cultural premises» in the
rational evaluation of a phenomenon, it is convenient to despoil it of any possibility that averts
it from the mere mechanical or evolutional determination, according to the «natural order». To
do this I will establish, after a brief analysis, the difference between the phenomenons of «first»
or «second» grade of determination, indispensable clarification due that the eminent laws,
respond always to phenomenons of the first grade.

For the gnostic «the world» that surrounds us is just the ordination of the matter
effectuated by the Creator God, The One, in a beginning, and which we perceive on its temporal
present. The Hyperborean Wisdom, mother of the gnostic thinking goes farther when affirms
that the space, and everything that it contains, is constituted by multiple associations of a
unique element denominated «archetypical quantum of energy», which constitutes a physics
term of the archetypical monad, i.e., of the absolute formative unit of the archetypical plane.

These quantums, which are real archetypal atoms, not conformers or structures of
forms, have each one of them, one indiscernible point through which it performs the
pantheistic diffusion of the Creator. It means that, due to a punctual system of
polydimensional contact, the presence of the Creator becomes effective in every ponderable

246