Page 250 - Microsoft Word - Belicena respaldo
P. 250
times: the culture is a strategic arm, skillfully used by who wants the perdition of the
Hyperborean Legacy. It is proved, in this way, that the «intermediary cultural model» between
the Self and the macrocosm, makes highly difficult to find the principle of the enclosure in the
world, as a law of nature.
Forty-Fourth Day
General Synthesis of the Hyperborean Wisdom:
The aforementioned complementary concepts have manifested the fact that a «law of
the nature» originates in some relations that the rational judgment establishes between
significant aspects. My objective is to clarify that even if some aspects really belongs to the
phenomenon, the relation that gave place to the eminent law has been created by the reason
and in no way can be attributed to the phenomenon itself. The reason, based in the preeminent
cultural premises, uses the world as a representation or projective model in such way that
any phenomenon expresses it correspondence with an equivalent intellectual conception. In
this way men make use of rational concepts of the phenomenon which keep a faint implication
with the phenomenon itself, with its truth.
When we perform the reasoning or analysis based in those concepts we fall in a mistake
and the result can't be other that the gradual immersion in confusion and irreality. This effect
is searched by the Enemy, I said it. We will see later what we can do to avoid it using what the
Hyperborean Wisdom teachings.
When we talk, before, about the hermetic principle I said that all the laws of the
macrocosm are reflected in equivalent laws in the microcosm. But «the laws of the nature» of
the macrocosm are just representations of a mathematical model originated in the human
mind, it means, in the microcosm, as I have analyzed. In the process that takes us to the
«scientific idea» of a phenomenon converges elements of two main sources: «the mathematical
principles» and the «preeminent cultural premises». the «mathematical principles» are
archetypical, come from inherited psychological structures: when we «learn mathematics», for
example, we just consciously update a finite number of formal systems that belong to the
cultural ambit, but the «mathematical principles» are not really «learnt» but they are really
«discovered» because they are basic matrices of the brain structure. The «preeminent cultural
premises» appear from the totality of the cultural elements, learned along our lives, which act
as a content of the systems of the cultural structure and that the cultural subject uses to
formulate judgments.
250