Page 280 - Leadership in the Indian Army
P. 280

their posts at Nathu La and Jelep La. According to the Corps HQ, the main
                defences of 17 Mountain Division were at Changgu, while Nathu La was
                only an observation post. In the adjoining sector, manned by 27 Mountain

                Division, Jelep La was also considered an observation post, with the main
                defences  located  at  Lungthu.  In  case  of  hostilities,  the  divisional
                commanders had been given the authority to vacate the posts and fall back
                on the main defences. Accordingly, orders were issued by Corps HQ to both
                divisions to vacate Nathu La and Jelep La.
                   Sagat did not agree with these orders. Nathu La and Jelep La were passes
                on the watershed which comprised the natural boundary. The MacMahon

                Line,  which  India  claimed  as  the  International  Border,  followed  the
                watershed principle, and India and China had gone to war over this issue
                three  years  earlier.  Vacating  the  passes  on  the  watershed  would  give  the
                Chinese  the  tactical  advantage  of  observation  and  fire  into  India,  while
                denying  the  same  to  our  own  troops.  Nathu  La  and  Jelep  La  were  also
                important because they were on the trade routes between India and Tibet,

                and  provided  the  only  means  of  ingress  through  the  Chumbi  Valley.
                Younghusband  had  used  the  same  route  during  his  expedition  65  years
                earlier, and handing it over to the enemy on a plate was not Sagat’s idea of
                sound military strategy. Sagat also reasoned that the discretion to vacate the
                posts lay with the divisional commander, and he was not obliged to follow
                instructions from Corps HQ in this regard.
                   In the event, 27 Mountain Division vacated Jelep La, which the Chinese

                promptly occupied. However, Sagat refused to vacate Nathu La, and when
                the  Chinese  became  belligerent  and  opened  fire,  he  also  opened  up  with
                guns and mortars, though there was a restriction imposed by Corps on the
                use of artillery. Lieutenant General (later General) G.G. Bewoor, the Corps
                Commander, was extremely annoyed, and tried to speak to Sagat and ask
                him to explain his actions. But since Sagat was with the forward troops and

                not at his headquarters, his GSO 1, Lieutenant Colonel Lakhpat Singh, had
                to bear the brunt of Bewoor’s wrath.
                   The  Chinese  had  installed  loudspeakers  at  Nathu  La,  and  warned  the
                Indians that they would suffer as they did in 1962 if they did not withdraw.
                However, Sagat had carried out a detailed appreciation of the situation and
                reached  the  conclusion  that  the  Chinese  were  bluffing.  They  took  up
                threatening postures, such as advancing in large numbers, but on reaching

                the border always stopped, turned around and withdrew. They also did not
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285