Page 173 - Maxwell House
P. 173

POYNTING's THEOREM                                                      153

            3.4.2   Foster's Reactance Theorem.


            Note that the part of the impedance plot shown in Figure 3.4.2c curves around the center of
            Smith chart meaning a small reflection from the circuitry. By looking at this impedance plot,
            we recognize that the impedance travels clockwise around Smith chart as the frequency is
            increased. This observation is not occasional and based on a much deeper concept that is the
            part of “Foster’s Reactance Theorem” and another useful tool to check the results of analytical
            or computer simulations. The proof of this theorem is based on Maxwell’s equations and can
            be considered as the variant of Poynting’s theorem that includes the frequency derivatives of
            the electric and magnetic field. For the sake of simplicity, we assume that the complex material
            parameters  () and  () are frequency and time independent.
                               
                      
            Applying the chain rule  to the second Maxwell’s equation  written for  some  space domain
            without internal charge and current sources (passive system) we have

                                                                          ∗
                       ∘    ( x  ) = −    (   ) = −   −    ∗  
                                                             ∗ ∗
                                    ∗
                                                  ∗ ∗
                        ∗                       0      0      0    �             (3.90)
                       �   
                         ∘
                                   − x  =   
                                                       0 
            Since the required transformations of (3.90)  just slightly deviate from used in Poynting’s
            theorem, we go straight to final equation
                       ∗    ∗                                        ∗          ∗
                         ∗  2     ∗   2          ′′    ′′  
               ∘ � x   +  x � = (  || +   || ) + 2 �    +     � (3.91)
                                                                         0 
                                                               0 
                                       0 
                                                0 
                                                       
            To simplify the subsequent considerations, we restrict our study to the practically important
            case of small loss
                                                 ′
                                            ′′
                                                    ′′
                                            ≪  ,    ≪   ′
                                                    
                                                 
                                            
                                           ∗        ∗             �                 (3.92)
                                           
                                    �   +    � ≪ 2( +  )
                                      0        0             
                                           
            Here  =   || /4 and   =   || /4 is the density of energy stored in electric and
                                               2
                                           ′
                        ′
                           2
                                    
                  
                      0 
                                         0 
            magnetic fields, respectively. Then (3.47) can be rewritten shorter as
                                          ∗    ∗
                                          
                                  ∘ � x   +   x � ≈ 4( +   )               (3.93)
                                                                
                                                           
                                           
            Before undertaking a general analysis of this equation, it is important to understand the meaning
            of inequities (3.92). In general, we can expect that in passive systems the electrical and magnetic
            field variations over frequency are continuous and quite smooth. Evidently, that is not true for
            the expected high-frequency sensitivity around the narrowly banded resonances. Therefore, the
            equity (3.93)  correctly describes  the field  behavior in any  spatial  domain if the  resonance
            cavities of high quality  are excluded  from the  study.  So we accept  this not very limiting
            restriction. Then integrating (3.93) over the hole aperture  in Figure 3.4.1 and applying the
            divergence (Gauss’s) theorem (see Appendix I) we obtain
                                        ∗     ∗
                                          
                           ∬   �  x    +      x   � ∘  ≈ 4( +   )             (3.94)
                                        
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178