Page 170 - Maxwell House
P. 170

150                                                                Chapter 3

        operate using such traditional values as voltage, current, inductance, etc. Evidently, that is not
        quite right as we move to higher frequencies up to optical spectrum and behind. We discussed
        this subject in previous chapters (see Section 2.2.8 in Chapter 2) and found that most of the
        traditionally lumped circuit conceptions including voltage cannot be defined uniquely in the
        case of AC and RF circuits. Let us demonstrate how to bypass this difficulty introducing the
        concept of the reflection coefficient. It is worth to point out that the reflection coefficient is a
        measurement-friendly parameter.

        Let start considering some hollow PEC sphere or another closed volume of any shape with a
        small hole  (relative to wavelength)  as  shown in Figure 3.4.1a.  Suppose that all sources of
        electromagnetic fields are external, i.e. located outside the sphere. If so, the EM energy can
        infiltrate the sphere through the opening only. Eventually, some electric and magnetic fields
        induced by the external sources reach the hole aperture (see Figure 3.4.1b). According to (3.18)
        the entering sphere incident energy depends on the tangential to the aperture (called terminal
        plane) components of electric and magnetic field {   ,    }. Note that all following fields
                                                        
                                                   
        and equations are treated in space-frequency domain.





















           Figure 3.4.1 a) Hollow sphere with a small hole, b) Incident field Poynting’s vector, c)
                                 Reflected field Poynting’s vector

        After bouncing back and forth inside the sphere, the part of penetrated EM field energy comes
        back (it means to reflect) to the hole aperture and leave the sphere through the same opening.
                                                   
        Therefore, the total fields on the aperture  {  ,   }  can be represented as the
                                                   
        superposition of two fields, one corresponds to the penetrating or incident {   ,    } and the
                                                                          
                                                                     
                                      
        other to the leaving or reflected {  ,   } field
                                      
                                          =    +  
                                      
                                                �                (3.82)
                                         =    +  
                                           
        In general, the spatial structures of the incident and reflected vectors on the aperture are entirely
        different.  However,  there  is  a  lot  of  practical reasons  we  will discuss  later, to keep these
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175