Page 172 - Maxwell House
P. 172

152                                                                Chapter 3

        Note that in any passive (there are no field sources) system the reflected wave magnitude cannot
        exceed the incident one meaning that 0 ≤ | | ≤ 1. It is a remarkable fact though that (3.88)
                                            
        defines the unique impedance for any given or measured value of reflection coefficient.

        However, the final picture is not so rosy because we defined the impedances in (3.85) and (3.86)
        as the ratio of the transverse electric and the transverse magnetic field. Unluckily, in some cases,
        these ratios are not constants and are the functions of the transverse spatial coordinates. There
        are several ways to fix this problem, and we are going to discuss them later. The simplest and
        most reasonable technique is to normalize all values to a 1-Ohm introducing the normalized
        impedance   as
                  

                               ⁄
                          =   =  +  = (1 +  ) (1 −  )⁄    ⎫
                                 
                                                    
                          
                                      
                                           
                                               2
                                           1−|  |    ⎪
                                   =  1+|  | 2  −2|  |cos     (3.89)
                                    
                                                             ⎬
                                          2|  |sin
                                   =  1+|  | 2  −2|  |cos  ⎪
                                    
                                                             ⎭
        The equities in (3.89) give us a one-to-one relationship between the reflection coefficient  ,
                                                                                  
        the real part (resistance)   and imaginary part (reactance)   of normalized impedance  .
                              
                                                          
                                                                                  
        This fact was used by American engineer Phillip H. Smith who proposed in 1939 a sophisticated
        graphic chart of his name shown in Figure 3.4.2. Smith chart is nothing more as a set of circles
        on complex number plane graphically illustrating the reflection coefficient phasor as shown in
        Figure 3.4.2a.  Using (3.87), we can calculate   for each discrete spot in the complex plane
                                               









              Figure 3.4.2 a) Reflection coefficient phasor on complex plane b) Smith chart, c)
                                Impedance test data on Smith chart
        and  then  connect by line all spots  with equal     (blue dashed  circle  in  Figure 3.4.2b).
                                                  
        Reiterating the same procedure for  (green dashed arc of circle in Figure 3.4.2b), we finally
                                      
        can come to the grid of multiple crossing lines shown in Figure 3.4.2b. Each crossing point
        corresponds to  some value of the reflection coefficient phasor and  unique  combination of
        { ,  }. Therefore, Smith chart can be used in engineering practice as an excellent graphical
          
             
        demonstrator of the impedance performance at one or more frequencies as seen in Figure 3.4.2c.
        “The Smith chart is one of the  most useful  graphical  tools for high  frequency  circuit
        applications. The chart provides a clever way to visualize complex functions and it continues
        to endure popularity decades after its original conception” [10].
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177