Page 246 - MJC submissions

8 REALITY OF THE INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT
I believe the reality is that:

Submitted to JS as an interdepended scheme and that the viabilily=== neither

• Development of the WH: EDF site should be restricted to a maximum scaling of 28
dwellings per hectare: meaning to 23 units: subject to compatibility with the
surrounding rural environment, the distinctive characteristics of Ashurst Wood and
compliant with AW Policy 9 and the Sustainability Appraisal for site 13:

• Only 0.08 hectares of the WH: LIC site, consisting of the small Northern car park was
assessed, but was rejected as unsuitable for development. The entire site, consisting of
the manor house, gardens and car parks (of an estimated area of 0.54 hectares) was
never proposed for development, was not assessed, was not subject to public
consultation, nor the referendum. It was therefore ineligible for inclusion in the AWNP
and was not lawfully included;

• Thus, there is no presumption whatsoever in favour of the WH:LIC development as
illustrated in the current Design and Access Statement (Page 28 of the following link).
• I believe that the submissions made by the Ashgrove Homes Limited (AHL) to it
American owners were based on plans and viability assessments for the combined EDF
and LIC sites and that while planning applications may have been kept apart for
tactical reasons they will lead to problems. I believe you have shown unwillingness,
bordering on reckless, to consider the wider picture.

Page10

E:\Cobasco\Personal, House and computer instructions\EDF and WH Development\MJC Plans theories and
Objectives\CONSOLIDATED SUBMISSIONS\5 Response to disclosures of 8th December.docx