Page 257 - MJC submissions
P. 257
19 SITE ALLOCATION & CONFLICTING REPORT AND METRICS
Brownfield Land Reg==December 2017—WH -SHLAA 470= 1.6 ha and 50 DdHa 31
PPG
20 2.6 MUST BE A WELCOME IMPROVEMENT
there is of course a close relationship to the life improvement Centre and the residential
blocks next to that part of the site. So far as that part of the site is concerned, the removal of
the oppressive existing office building must be a welcome improvement
21 PHOTO OF EDF AND SITE—SPOT THE DIFFERENCE
22 PARA 2.8 URBS IN RURE
the current, if unsightly built form shows how it is possible to have an urban character of
development here without affecting his wider semi-rural setting. Urbs in rure is therefore
possible, to achieve the most effective development of the site
why shot himself in the foot…
23 3.1 NO RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
Past planning permissions relate only to the EDF building and their operation . There is thus
no planning history that is relevant to this proposal
Not true Ashbourne Park
Guff --- reality --- AW preserved
24 4.1 SUBECT TO:
the entire application site has been identified for residential development------ these will be
supported subject to the following criteria. I will not repeat the detail of the criteria here but
observe as follows
Will not repeat the detail of the criteria here but observe as follows
Schemes must reflect in respect the predominant character of the area with particular regard to unit type, scale and
massing
Ensure that all properties are set back from the front boundary to reflect the pattern of development in the
immediate area and have a layout which reflects and respects the spacious character of the locality to help
integrate the new development into the vicinity
Provide a mix of dwelling types and sizes, both market and affordable, to include small homes and home suitable
for elderly residents. Appropriate mix to be informed by an up-to-date housing needs survey together with
information from MSDC’s common housing register
Page21
E:\Cobasco\Personal, House and computer instructions\EDF and WH Development\MJC Plans theories and
Objectives\CONSOLIDATED SUBMISSIONS\5 Response to disclosures of 8th December.docx