Page 28 - Megaprojects Playbook
P. 28

MEGA PROJECT SCHEDULING REQUIREMENTS

               ◆  On Mega Projects, the need to manage procurement and track delays is greater than smaller projects.
               ◆  Procurement can be broken into each component of the building to track,
               requiring close coordination with vendors and subcontractors.
               ◆  Procurement, weather, RFIs and change orders all have the potential to consume float. Timely
               quantification and early warning of delays from each is a primary benefit to a full-time scheduler.
               ◆  Increased sophistication of client resources with respect to schedule demands an individual who is knowledgeable of common
               industry practices in scheduling to defend time extensions based on on-site conditions and circumstances unique to the project.




            RESOURCE LOADING BENEFITS

               ◆  Cost and resource loading
               provides the benefit
               of further validation
               of schedule integrity.
               Constrained by known
               resource limits (e.g.
               manpower, material
               availability, etc.), resource
               loading provides a quick
               look at whether or not
               the schedule is stacking,
               beneficial when it comes
               to updates mid-project.
               ◆  Resource and cost loading
               provide great benefits, but
               not all scheduling software
               has this functionality.
               Choice in software is crucial
               to provide this benefit.




            REGULAR PROJECT                                      MEGA PROJECT



                 ◆  No need for full time scheduler; monthly visit sufficient.    ◆  Schedule validation/review is an ongoing process
                 ◆  Less complex schedule = lower time                 – full-time dedicated team member needed.
                 commitment for update.                                ◆  Larger projects have larger schedules – schedule
                                                                       updates may take days to complete.
                 ◆  LDs typically lower, delays not as costly.
                 ◆  Owner needs are not as stringent.                  ◆  Consequences of delays are magnified;
                                                                       more attention to schedule is required.
                 ◆  Contracts may not emphasize schedule as much.
                                                                       ◆  Increased attention to schedule is key as Owner
                                                                       may employ consultant to critique all submissions.
                                                                       ◆  Contracts specially written for larger projects may
                                                                       have schedule specific verbiage requiring higher
                                                                       time (and cost) commitments specific to schedule.





            HASKELL | WE CREATE THINGS THAT MATTER                                                                 25
                                    CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION.  FOR INTERNAL HASKELL USE ONLY.
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33