Page 69 - The Art of Learning by Josh Waitzkin_Neat plip book
P. 69

Then he devises an individualized  training  progr am that  systematically de epe ns
                the student’s knowledge of chess whi le nur tur ing hi s or her  nat ur al gi fts.

                    Mark  Dvoretsky,  on  the  other  hand,     has  created  a  compr ehensive  traini ng
                system  that  he  believes  all  students  sho ul d  fit  into.  His  metho d  whe n  worki ng
                with  a  pupil  is  to  break  the  student   down  rather   brut ally  and  then   stuf f  hi m  or
                her   into   the   cookie-cutter   mold   of   his   training   system.   In   my   opi ni on   thi s

                approach     can   have   profoundly    negative    cons equen ces   for   spi rited   young
                students.
                    During    the   critical   period   of   my   chess   career   following   the   release   of   the
                film  Searching  for  Bobby  Fischer,  there  was  a  disagreement  about  what   di rection

                my   study   should   take.   On   one   side   was   Dvoretsky    and   his   protégé ,   my   ful l
                time  coach,  who  believed  I  should  immerse  myself  in  the  study   of  pr ophy laxis,
                the   art   of   playing   chess   like   an   anaconda.   Great   pr ophy lactic   pl ayers,   like
                Karpov     and   Petrosian,    seem   to   sense   thei r   oppo nen t’s   intention.   The y

                systematically  cinch  down  the  pressur e,  squeezi ng  every  last  br eath  of  life  out
                of  their  prey  while  preventing  any   aggr essive  attempt   bef ore  it  even  be gi ns   to
                materialize.   They   are   counterpunchers    by   natur e   and   they    tend   to   be    qui et,
                calculating,  rather  introverted  personal ities.  On  the  other   side  of  the   argume nt

                was  Yuri  Razuvaev,  who  insisted  that   I  sho ul d  cont inue  to  nur tur e  my  natural
                voice  as  a  chess  player.  Razuvaev  believed  that   I  was  a  gifted  attacki ng  pl ayer
                who should not be bullied away from my strengt hs . Ther e was no  que stion  tha t
                I  needed  to  learn  more  about  Karpo v’s  type  of  ches s  to  make  the  ne xt  steps   in

                my   development,     but   Razuvaev   po int ed   out    that    I   coul d   learn   Karpo v   from
                Kasparov.
                    This   was   a   delicate   and   rather   mystical-feeling   idea,   and   I   wish   I   ha d
                possessed  the  sophistication  as  a  sixteen- year-old  bo y  to  see  its  po wer.  On  one

                level,   Razuvaev’s   point   was   that   the   gr eat   attacki ng   players   all   po ssess   ke en
                understanding of positional chess, and  the  way for someone  like  myself to study
                high-level  positional  chess  is  to  study   the   way  the   great  pl ayers  of  my  nature
                have   integrated   this   element   of   the   art.   An   interesting   parallel   woul d   be    to

                consider a lifetime rock guitarist who  wants to learn  abo ut  classical mus ic. Le t’s
                say  there  are  two  possible  guides  for  him  in  thi s  educat ional   pr ocess.  One   is  an
                esoteric  classical  composer  who  has  never  tho ught   much   of  the    “vul ga rity  of
                rock   and   roll,”   and   another   is   a   fellow   rocker   who    fell   in   love   with   classical

                music years ago and decided to dedi cate his life to thi s di fferent gen re of mus ic.
                The ex-rocker might touch a common  nerve whi le the  compo ser might  feel like
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74