Page 55 - EXHIBIT 12 RESEARCH MANUAL
P. 55

RESEARCH SERVICES POLICIES AND GUIDELINES 45

                           b.  Criteria in Evaluating R&D Proposals


                              Following are some considerations under each criterion to evaluate the Projects
                              proposals:


                              1.  Tangible Impact on Improving Quality of Academic Programs. The extent to which
                                  the proposal is expected to bring direct benefits to the policy formulation aimed at
                                  improving quality of academic program;


                              2.  Multidisciplinary Approach. The involvement of proponents coming from different
                                  disciplines is given preference in the evaluation of proposals; The partnership of
                                  senior and Junior researchers (mentor-mentee relationships) is also desirable.


                              3.  Clarity and Manageability. The proposal should be clear, concise and implementable
                                  within the period as proposed. Among the desirable characters should be:

                                     ● Key activities of the project and time for each are clearly outlined in the proposal.


                                     ● Attainable outcome results (long term) and output results (short term or
                                      immediate)

                                     ● Realistic performance measurement indicators


                                     ● Small scale and short project cycle (able to demonstrate results within shorter
                                      period)

                              4.  Sustainability, Replication and Up-scaling. The extent to which the expected results
                                  of the proposal have the potentials to be replicated or up-scaled in larger scale, in
                                  another geographic region or in other context.

                              5.  Realistic and Relevant Budget. Among these should include:


                                     ● The extent to which the proposed budget is realistic.


                                     ● The extent to which the proposed budget items are relevant.

                           c.  Evaluation of the Proposals


                              Projects ideally should cover one-year implementation period. All proposals will be
                              reviewed  by  a  campus  committee designated.  Consolidated  proposals  by  campus
                              will be endorsed and submitted to the University level for final review and approval
                              by a committee to be designated by the VP-RDET. Evaluation team in the campus and
                              university level can make use of the set of evaluation criteria as mentioned above.


                           d.  Application Procedure

                              Potential researchers from various colleges and campuses of the university are invited



                                                                               RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES







       RM.indb   45                                                                                              11/11/14   1:55 PM
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60