Page 83 - M97TB9_2018-19_[low-res]_F2F_Neat2
P. 83

Chapter 4 Features and operation of proportional reinsurance treaties                         4/11




               However, surplus treaties are significantly more complicated to administer than quota share treaties
               because the proportion ceded varies from risk to risk. Additionally, there is always the possibility that
               they will attract a higher than usual proportion of the larger or more hazardous risks. This makes them
               difficult to arrange if the balance between the premium income available and the maximum liability to be
               assumed is not adequate or reasonable.
               In obligatory surplus treaties the insurer, having exhausted its retention, is obliged to feed the different
               covers successively. Nevertheless, the insurer retains the right to proceed selectively by the terms of the
               treaty wording in order to protect the treaties. For example, in the case of particularly large risks, the
               insurer would only use a part of its surplus capacity or would reinsure all of the risk facultatively.

                Example 4.8
                Let us consider a simple reinsurance programme which combines a proportional surplus treaty where facultative
                proportional reinsurance is required.
                The insurer:

                • has fixed its retention at £10 m and has placed a proportional surplus treaty with five lines;
                • writes a risk with an exposure of £100 m;                                                          Chapter
                • requires facultative capacity of £40 m.                                                            4

                Purely proportional reinsurance allocates the premium and the claims generated by the risk as follows:
                Retention:                              £10 m = 10%
                Surplus treaty:                         £50 m = 50%
                Facultative reinsurance:                £40 m = 40%
                The effect of facultative proportional reinsurance in the event of a loss is described in table 4.7 (in terms of figures)
                and in figure 4.4.

                Table 4.7: Loss distribution with surplus treaty and facultative proportional reinsurance

                    100% loss      Surplus (w/o   Treaty retention   Facultative   Overall retention             Reference copy for CII Face to Face Training
                                    retention)                      proportional
                       –               –                –               –               –
                     10.000           5.000           1.000            4.000           1.000

                     20.000          10.000           2.000            8.000           2.000
                     30.000          15.000           3.000           12.000           3.000
                     40.000          20.000           4.000           16.000           4.000
                     50.000          25.000           5.000           20.000           5.000
                     60.000          30.000           6.000           24.000           6.000
                     70.000          35.000           7.000           28.000           7.000
                     80.000          40.000           8.000           32.000           8.000

                     90.000          45.000           9.000           36.000           9.000
                    100.000          50.000           10.000          40.000          10.000
                  Amount of loss
                     (1000)
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88