Page 79 - M97TB9_2018-19_[low-res]_F2F_Neat2
P. 79

Chapter 4 Features and operation of proportional reinsurance treaties                          4/7




               Surplus treaties are usually a specified multiple of that gross retention, resulting in surplus capacity
               being described as ‘x lines of y maximum gross retention’. For example, a ten-line first surplus treaty
               subject to a maximum cession of £5m on any one risk. One line is a maximum of £500,000, thereby
               giving the insurer a maximum gross capacity of £5.5m on the best risks (i.e. retention £0.5m plus
               cession to surplus of £5m).
               There are also cases where surplus capacity is constructed on the insurer’s net retention, or gross
               retention after quota share cession, but we shall concentrate on surplus capacity geared to a gross
               retention. If the reinsurance treaty were a ten-line surplus treaty, the maximum coverage under the
               reinsurance would be as follows:


                Table 4.3: Maximum coverage under the treaty
                                                    Retention               Ten-line surplus limit
                Factories                           £150,000                   £1,500,000
                Warehouses                          £200,000                   £2,000,000
                Retail outlets                      £350,000                   £3,500,000                            Chapter
                Offices                             £500,000                   £5,000,000                            4

                Miscellaneous                       £400,000                   £4,000,000


                Be aware
                Further lines could be added beyond the ‘first’ surplus treaty to become a ‘second’ surplus.


               A2A Operation of surplus treaties
               The mechanics of ceding a risk under a surplus treaty do not differ from those of an individual facultative
               proportional cession. However, there are substantial differences in the creation of any surplus treaty.
                Example 4.6                                                                                      Reference copy for CII Face to Face Training
                Let us assume a four-line surplus treaty, giving the insurer an automatic underwriting capacity of £5m (£1m own
                gross retention plus £4m, comprising four surplus lines each of £1m).
                The insurer has accepted five risks, all of first-class construction. If the insurer decided to retain its maximum gross
                retention then the risks would be apportioned to the surplus treaty as follows:


                 Table 4.4: Risks apportioned to treaty
                 Risk                  Original sum insured  Company retains   Cedes to surplus %
                 1                        1,000,000         1,000,000 (100%)         Nil
                 2                        2,500,000         1,000,000 (40%)     1,500,000 (60%)
                 3                        3,200,000         1,000,000 (31.25%)  2,200,000 (68.75%)

                 4                        4,000,000         1,000,000 (25%)     3,000,000 (75%)
                 5                        5,000,000         1,000,000 (20%)     4,000,000 (80%)
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84