Page 84 - M97TB9_2018-19_[low-res]_F2F_Neat2
P. 84
4/12 M97/February 2018 Reinsurance
Figure 4.4: Loss distribution with surplus treaty and facultative proportional
reinsurance
Surplus treaty
Retention 10m
Five lines 50m
Exposure 100m
Distribution of Fac.surplus
liability (1000)
reinsured proportionally 40m =40%
100.000
90.000
80.000
70.000
4
Chapter 60.000 Treaty retention Facultative reinsurance
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
Surplus
10.000
0
10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000 70.000 80.000 90.000 100.000
Amount of loss (1000) Reference copy for CII Face to Face Training
A2D Advantages of surplus treaties
The advantages of surplus treaties are:
• A surplus treaty allows the insurer to vary its retention upon a particular risk.
• There is automatic capacity available upon a particular class and size of risk providing that such
cession falls within the treaty conditions.
• The insurer is allowed to retain a greater proportion of its overall premium income. This aspect would
be diluted if the insurer chose to effect any quota share reinsurance on all or selected parts of its
account.
• The insurer receives a ceding commission, usually sufficient to pay the acquisition costs and
expenses, together with an additional contribution to reward underwriting profit.
• Unlimited cover is generally provided for aggregation of risk losses in a single loss event.
A3 Disadvantages of surplus treaties
The disadvantages of surplus treaties are:
• The insurer stands or falls by its chosen retention, so this is a fundamentally important calculation for
the insurer.
• Comparison of results between the insurer’s net results and those of its surplus reinsurers might be
different. Imagine a situation where in years when the insurer’s gross loss ratio is low, the net loss
ratio after surplus cessions is high. Whichever way the results fall might influence the original
construction between the insurer’s net and gross accounts and the benefit which the insurer should
obtain from such arrangements.
Consider this…
By selecting which risks it is reinsuring to its surplus treaty according to a pre-agreed table of limits the insurer
could, unwittingly or otherwise, only reinsure those risks most vulnerable to losses. Think how this would exacerbate
the difference between its experience and that of its reinsurer(s).