Page 12 - 이헌국 조형예술 55년전 한전아트센터 2025. 9. 18 – 9. 26
P. 12

As contemporary art moves away from purely visual expression and toward multisensory, conceptual, and
           participatory forms, traditional classifications become insufficient. The term “plastic arts” or “sculptural arts”
           has emerged to describe works that involve not only sight, but also touch, sound, space, and narrative. These
           terminological changes reflect the need to accommodate evolving forms of contemporary art.


           All artists work with themes—whether repeated or constantly evolving—but what ultimately defines an artist
           is their way of seeing and interpreting the world. It is within this framework that their artistic vision is born and
           cultivated.


           To examine the many stages of Professor Lee’s career is to gain insight into the development of modern
           Korean ceramic art.

           In the early years, he experimented by painting or embossing on ceramic surfaces, deliberately deforming
           traditional vessel forms. Over time, these forms shed their functional origins and became organic in shape.
           Later, the previously recurring bulbous volumes began to deflate, hinting at the human figure. By 2012, his
           works included fully formed portrait busts. Having long explored the viscosity and pliability of clay, Professor
           Lee now turns toward new approaches.

           The work titled “A Journey of 110 Years” signals the dawn of yet another chapter. Composed of ceramic
           shards from sixty years ago and a vessel from fifty years ago, the work reimagines an extraterrestrial habitat
           on Mars. When I first encountered this piece, I was reminded of Julian Schnabel’s iconic plate paintings.
           The arrangement of ceramic fragments as a pictorial field suggested to me that a significant transition was
           underway in Lee’s practice.


           Unlike Schnabel’s deliberately rough textures, Professor Lee meticulously smooths and refines the edges of
           each fragment, creating a tactile softness. This careful treatment of the surface reveals his deep sensitivity
           to materiality and texture—his focus on tangibility and plasticity. While Schnabel’s works can be considered
           paintings despite their three-dimensionality, Lee’s works transcend painterly concerns and assert themselves
           as sculptural entities. This emphasis on physicality stems from his roots in shaping and firing clay—craft born
           of earth and fire.


           Even the arduous process of scraping away layers from already-fired surfaces speaks to Lee’s pursuit of
           tactile intimacy. His works are inscribed with what may be called the “memory of the hand.” The primordial
           relationship between hand and clay is ever-present. Perhaps this is why his works emanate warmth and
           organic vitality. The clusters of hollowed-out voids, quietly resonating through the shards, suggest living






           10
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17