Page 39 - RCM - A practical Guide_V1
P. 39

RCM - A Practical Guide



            If the criteria for OC maintenance are not met then the answer is, obviously, no and the analysis must
            move on to the next available mitigation strategy.

            Is a hard-time (HT) task applicable and effective?
            Unlike OC maintenance, HT maintenance is dependent on the equipment type displaying wear out
            characteristics consistent with patterns A, B and C (of the 6 patterns of failure)- or - to show an
            increased conditional probability of failure (CpF) as it gets older.
            Criteria
            For HT maintenance to be selected certain criteria must be met:
            •   The asset type must show a definite age at which there is a rapid increase in the CpF
            •   Most items of that type must survive to that age

            Yes

            Types of hard time maintenance
            There are two types of task of HT maintenance to be considered, both of which have their own
            selection criteria and limitations. They are:
                    1.   Scheduled Restoration
                    2.   Scheduled Discard

            Scheduled restoration
            Maintenance’s old friend.
            A restoration task involves acting at regular intervals to restore the asset to its inherent operational
            capability and failure resistance. The asset must be maintained in order to prevent failure (or more
            accurately, the consequences of failure).
            Traditional (pre-RCM) thinking applied this strategy to most complex assets but, post-RCM, this
            mitigation strategy is likely to be in the minority.
            As is the RCM way, when considering a restoration task there are two options:
                1.   Full restoration - A general maintenance activity that is carried out on asset, in its totality
                2.   Partial restoration - A targeted maintenance activity at a specific, or dominant, failure
                    mode
            To reiterate, a restoration task is only appropriate if the operation can restore the asset’s inherent
            resistance to failure. If the asset type shows a definite age where the CpF rapidly increases but it is not
            possible to restore its inherent resistance to failure, then a scheduled discard may be appropriate.
            Scheduled discard
            If it isn’t deemed possible to restore the inherent resistance to failure of the asset, it may be necessary
            to consider replacing it on the assumption that by fitting a new item, the failure resistance, and hence
            operational capability of the main equipment, will be restored.




                                                                         39
            © ASPIRE CONSULTING LTD +44 (0) 1827 723820
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44