Page 111 - Theoretical and Practical Interpretation of Investment Attractiveness
P. 111

investment activities (of course, with  a certain time  lag) and shows  whether the subject’s
         investment activity is related to the results of the realization of its attractiveness.
              In general, expert assessment methods based on macroeconomic or multifactor models
         are widely used. The authors note that, without denying the usefulness of this type of analysis,
         which reflects the general picture of problems in each region, the use of most of the listed
         methods requires a lot of work, expensive expert actions, and due to the lack of the resulting
         number of reliability criteria in the method, which is considered objective in nature, does not
         confirm the objectivity of the results obtained.
              Of course, there are a number of characteristics that cannot be measured statistically,
         but their number is small and of little importance. In this case, the main attention is paid to
         real indicators (due to their high level of objectivity), that is, state statistics and quantitative
         details of economic, social, natural and geographical indicators of regions that are important
         for economic development. investors .
              Econometric methods are not widely used in  practice, since they are intended to
         determine  the attractiveness (activity  or competitiveness) of  a particular  industry and
         enterprise. However, their gradual adaptation and improvement allows one to obtain good
         results. In general, these methodologies use macroeconomic indicators in their rankings.
              These methods are the most important: they do not show how one region, for example,
         the Republic of  Uzbekistan ,  is  ahead or behind another country, and do not provide for
         studying the dynamics of these ratings. In  fact, when a  territory rises  in the ranking, it
         improves its indicators on its own, since the trend of integral indicators for several years is
         zero or negative growth, and an increase in rating can be achieved due to external factors (a
         sharp decline in indicators in neighboring countries). At the moment, the most convenient and
         objective approach is based on an econometric assessment of statistical data using elements
         of methods for realizing investment attractiveness with subsequent correction of the results
         based on expert assessment.
              Also,  in  our opinion, in order to  increase the level of  objectivity, reliability and
         accuracy of the results obtained, in addition to  operational calculations, it is advisable to
         perform calculations in a  dynamic mode for at least a  five-year period. This allows us to
         determine the trend of territory activity. Regions according to this trend This allows you to
         maintain the attractiveness of “  previous ” years and identify problem areas for the next
         SWOT analysis.
              Below is the method involves choosing the best option from alternatives; the level of
         validity of calculations is classified as high (compared to scoring methods), since each of
         them has a corresponding normalization criterion (that is, bringing the original data to infinite
         values) - in our example, this means normalizing the average and maximum amounts. The
         resulting standardized initial data allows you to perform any arithmetic operations on them
         with the required accuracy k.
              In  general, the methodology for  assessing the  investment potential of regions  that
         include restrictions consists of the following stages of accounting and analytical operations.
              1st stage. Quantitative assessment of fog power. It takes into account the following:

                                          108
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116