Page 98 - Theoretical and Practical Interpretation of Investment Attractiveness
P. 98

3.1.1-figure
            Research aimed at methodical evaluation of the socio-economic condition of the
                                  regions of the country  128

                        Style                         Indicator system
          True Savings                    GS (True Savings) =  (GDS-CFC)+EDE-DRNR-DME,
          (“True  savings” as defined  by the World  where: CDS  –  gross  domestic  savings, CFC  –
          Bank)                           depreciation of productive assets (due to obsolescence),
                                          EDE – education expenditures, DRNR – loss of natural
                                          resources be , DME  – damage due to environmental
                                          degradation.
          The  indicator system was developed by  the  A total of 60 indicators in 4 areas: social, economic,
          United Nations Commission on  Sustainable  environmental, institutional.
          Development (UN).
          Integral indicators indicating the stability of  Indicators in 3 areas: economic, social, environmental.
          the  socio-economic system of  the  region,
          proposed by S.A. Zarubin.
          A method for a comprehensive assessment of  11 indicators: GNP, volume of capital investments per
          the socio-economic development of a territory,  capita, volume of  foreign trade  per  capita, average
          proposed by O. V. Skotarenko.   number of employees in private enterprises, etc.
          A methodology for assessing socio-economic  Five areas: real sector, investment and foreign economic
          potential was proposed by I. V. Taranenko.   activity, financial results of enterprises, social sector,
                                          consumer market.
          Socio-economic  potential of the  region,  Six areas: labor, production, nature, finance, transport,
          proposed by A.N. Syrov.         infrastructure.

              It is possible to compare methodological analyzes aimed at the problem of stabilization
         of socio-economic development of the country, and by comprehensively researching them,
         partial views can  be given.  The  first method is  to  base the country/territory stability
         assessment on a single indicator. This includes the "Genuine saving" method. Its purpose is
         to take into account the net change value of total assets important for development: productive
         assets, natural resources, state of the environment, human capital.
                  Calculation of the final indicator (GS) is carried out in two stages: in the first stage,
         the value of net domestic savings (NDS)  is determined, in the second stage, the increase of
         net domestic savings due to educational expenses and the decrease due to the loss of natural
         resources due to the deterioration of the environment are shown.
              The advantage of this method is that it results in the calculation of positive or negative
         results with the same value. Persistence of negative results means that the region is on the
         path of unsustainable development. However, when comparing the "Genuine saving" method
         with other methods, it also has some weaknesses. That is, this method makes it impossible to
         assess the sustainable development of the region from the point of view of the country's well-
         being.


         128 Mustafakulov Sh.I. Analysis of existing methods of assessing the socio-economic and innovative potential of regions.
         "Finance and banking" electronic scientific journal. April 2016, Issue 3, pp. 5-16.

                                           95
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103