Page 99 - Theoretical and Practical Interpretation of Investment Attractiveness
P. 99

The second  method was recommended  by  the UN  Commission on Sustainable
         Development (UN  CSD  The United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development) in
         1996, in which the system of all sustainable development indicators covers four areas: social,
         economic, environmental and institutional. In the initial development, a total of 134 indicators
         were calculated, taking into account the above four scopes, later they were improved and
         reduced to 60, and various descriptions were introduced in the section of topics, and their
         reliability was further increased.
              The  above-mentioned  methods that  reflect the  sustainable  socio-economic
         development of
         countries/regions are effective and in some sense universal. However, taking into account the
         different conditions and development of  the regions of  Uzbekistan, it  is  unacceptable to
         implement it as it is. Therefore, it is appropriate to adapt these methods to the socio-economic
         development model of our country, to implement them based on the specific characteristics
         of our country.
              Today, the method of integrated indicators used to assess the potential (competence)
         of regions can be divided into two large groups. Among these, it is permissible to cite methods
         of calculation through average arithmetic and derivative quantities.
              For this, it is recommended to use the following integrated indicators, which consist of
         several stages.
                   The first stage is justification of the selected indicators.
                   The second stage is to evaluate the stability of the territory according to each
          indicator (3.1, 3.2).


                            –  direct indicator,           (3.1)

                           –  reverse indicator          (3.2)

              Here, xi is  the amount of indicators in area i;  max(xi), min(xi) – sample indicator
         (benchmarking), i.e. indicators reflecting the optimal (critical) value of area development are
         selected.
              The third stage is the calculation of economic, social and ecological (econ., soc.,
         ecol.) stability through a multifaceted comparative analysis.
              The fourth stage is the formation of an integral indicator.
              The integral indicator of stability is calculated by the following formula:

                                                                                      (3.3)
                   The value of the integral indicator is in the range from 0 to 1.



                                           96
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104