Page 29 - EdViewptsSpring2019-web
P. 29

common understanding of the student   a tiered intervention system helps that   Conclusion
          while building a rapport. Second, it   child improve through the Interven-
          allows the parents an opportunity to   tion and Referral Services Committee   The more familiar character education
          dialogue with their child to reflect on   (I&RS). This committee harnesses   programs only recognize the students
          the events of the day that resulted in   counseling or other outside resources   who demonstrate good behavior and
          their final color. Third, it provides the   (NJDOE, 2018b). These interventions   rarely provide support for our at-risk
          teacher and parents the opportunity   hope to build and strengthen the rela-  students. It is my belief that good stu-
          to communicate on a regular basis. If   tionships between student, school and   dents will be good students regardless
          these relationships are strengthened,   family by collaborating and exposing   of the setting. However, if schools,
          the students will develop a robust so-  the student to more opportunities to   districts, and communities want to
          cial and emotional foundation that will   succeed with the help of specialized   safeguard the success of all students,
          promote lifelong learning.           professionals.                       there needs to be a paradigm shift.
                                                                                    Without programs, students of all ages
          Finally, the character education     The specifics and primary compo-     will continue to exhibit behaviors that
          program also assists the administra-  nents about the social and emotional   require disciplinary action, and by the
          tors, teachers and support staff in   program were mentioned to provide a   time they need discipline, it may be
          identifying students who may require   clear focus and understanding of the   too late.
          additional support. When a student   intended expectations and interven-
          consistently ends their day on colors   tions of this home-grown character   I look forward to introducing the next
          representing poor behavioral choices,   education program.                phase of this home-grown character
                                                                                    education program in 2019!

          References
          Bettencourt, A., Gross, D., & Ho, G. (2016, March). The Costly Consequences of Not Being Socially and Behaviorally Ready by
          Kindergarten: Associations With Grade Retention. Baltimore, MD: Baltimore Education Research Consortium. Retrieved from
          http://baltimore-berc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/SocialBehavioralReadinessMarch2016.pdf
          Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009, March). The Prosocial Classroom: Teacher Social and Emotional Competence in Re-
          lation to Student and Classroom Outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525. doi:10.3102/0034654308325693
          McKown, C. (2017, Spring). Social and Emotional Learning: A Policy Vision for the Future. Princeton, NJ: The Future of Chil-
          dren. Retrieved from https://futureofchildren.princeton.edu/sites/futureofchildren/files/media/foc-policy_brief_spring_2017v5.pdf
          New Jersey Department of Education. (2018b). Resource Manual for Intervention and Referral Services (I&Rs). Trenton, NJ:
          Author. Retrieved from https://www.state.nj.us/education/students/irs/
          Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building Academic Success of Social and Emotional Learn-
          ing: What Does the Research Say? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

           About the Author

                         Currently, Dr. Christopher Meyrick is a superintendent in New Jersey. Chris began his career as a special
                         education teacher, spending the majority of his time in the self-contained and resource classroom settings.
                         As a classroom teacher, he recognized the co-curricular need for Social and Emotional Development for all
                         students. He continued his advocacy as a shared assistant principal and school principal







          Supporting School Leaders' Instructional Capacity:

          National SAM Innovation Project

          Learn all about the SAM Innovation Project
          Many principals in New Jersey have increased their instructional leadership capacity through the
          SAM Project. The SAM process follows five key steps: Readiness, Baseline Data Collection,
          Daily TimeTrack Meeting, Implementation Specialists and Time Change Coaching, and Year
          Later Data Collection. Attend this free information session and hear from the national founder
          along with New Jersey educators who are using the system.
          If you are interested in bringing SAM to your school to help your principal find more time in the
          day for instructional leadership, please contact Dr. Mary Reece, FEA Director of Special Projects,
          at 609-860-1220 or mreece@njpsa.org.

                                            Educational Viewpoints       -27-       Spring 2019
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34