Page 349 - Fundamentals of Management Myths Debunked (2017)_Flat

348 Part 4 • Leading
Technology Use of Irish and U.S. velopment,” Academy of Manage- in Self-Managed Teams: Why of Performance Feedback on Fu-
Students in Virtual Teams”; A. ment Review, July 2001, 377–96; ‘Bureaucratic’ Teams Can Be ture Group Performance,” Group
Malhotra, A. Majchrzak, and B. and K. T. Dirks, “Trust in Leader- Better Learners”; and R. Wage- & Organization Management,
Rosen, “Leading Virtual Teams,” ship and Team Performance: Evi- man, “Critical Success Factors for September 2003, 366–91.
Academy of Management Perspec- dence from NCAA Basketball,” Creating Superb Self-Managing 44. SmartPulse, “How Effectively Do
tives, February 2007, 60–70; B. L. Journal of Applied Psychology Teams,” Organizational Dynam- You Resolve Conflict with Oth-
Kirkman and J. E. Mathieu, “The (December 2000): 1004–12. ics, Summer 1997, 55. ers?” Smart Brief on Leadership,
Dimensions and Antecedents of 34. R. R. Hirschfeld, M. J. Jordan, 41. Campion, Papper, and Medsker, www.smartbrief.com, April 21,
Team Virtuality,” Journal of Man- H. S. Field, W. F. Giles, and A. “Relations between Work Team 2015.
agement (October 2005): 700–18; A. Armenakis, “Becoming Team Characteristics and Effective- 45. K. C. Kostopoulos and N. Bozio-
J. Gordon, “Do Your Virtual Players: Team Members’ Mastery ness,” 430; B. L. Kirkman and nelos, “Team Exploratory and
Teams Deliver Only Virtual Per- of Team Knowledge as a Predictor B. Rosen, “Powering Up Teams,” Exploitative Learning: Psycho-
formance?” Training (June 2005): of Team Task Proficiency and Ob- Organizational Dynamics, Winter logical Safety, Task Conflict, and
20–25; L. L. Martins, L. L. Gil- served Teamwork Effectiveness,” 2000, 48–66; and D. C. Man and Team Performance,” Group &
son, and M. T. Maynard, “Virtual Journal of Applied Psychology 91, S. S. K. Lam, “The Effects of Organization Management, June
Teams: What Do We Know and no. 2 (2006): 467–74. Job Complexity and Autonomy 2011, 385–415; K. J. Behfar, E.
Where Do We Go from Here?” 35. S. T. Bell, “Deep-Level Com- on Cohesiveness in Collectivist A. Mannix, R. S. Peterson, and W.
Journal of Management (Decem- position Variables as Predictors and Individualist Work Groups: M. Trochim, “Conflict in Small
ber 2004): 805–35; S. A. Furst, M. of Team Performance: A Meta- A Cross-Cultural Analysis,” Jour- Groups: The Meaning and Con-
Reeves, B. Rosen, and R. S. Black- Analysis,” Journal of Applied nal of Organizational Behavior sequences of Process Conflict,”
burn, “Managing the Life Cycle of Psychology 92, no. 3 (2007): (December 2003): 979–1001. Small Group Research, April
Virtual Teams,” Academy of Man- 595–615; and M. R. Barrick, G. L. 42. A. Mehta, H. Feild, A. Armenakis, 2011, 127–76; R. S. Peterson and
agement Executive, May 2004, Stewart, M. J. Neubert, and M. K. and N. Mehta, “Team Goal Ori- K. J. Behfar, “The Dynamic Re-
6–20; B. L. Kirkman, B. Rosen, P. Mount, “Relating Member Abil- entation and Team Performance: lationship between Performance
E. Tesluk, and C. B. Gibson, “The ity and Personality to Work-Team The Mediating Role of Team Feedback, Trust, and Conflict in
Impact of Team Empowerment on Processes and Team Effective- Planning,” Journal of Manage- Groups: A Longitudinal Study,”
Virtual Team Performance: The ness,” Journal of Applied Psychol- ment (August 2009): 1026–46; K. Organizational Behavior and Hu-
Moderating Role of Face-to-Face ogy (June 1998): 377–91. Blanchard, D. Carew, and E. Pari- man Decision Processes, Septem-
Interaction,” Academy of Man- 36. M. Costello, “Team Weaver,” Peo- si-Carew, “How to Get Your Group ber–November 2003, 102–12; and
agement Journal (April 2004): ple Management, January 2011, to Perform Like a Team,” Training K. A. Jehn, “A Qualitative Analy-
175–92; F. Keenan and S. E. Ante, 26–27; and C. Margerison and and Development (September sis of Conflict Types and Dimen-
“The New Teamwork,” Business D. McCann, Team Management: 1996): 34–37; K. D. Scott and A. sions in Organizational Groups,”
Week e.biz, February 18, 2002, Practical New Approaches (Lon- Townsend, “Teams: Why Some Administrative Science Quarterly,
EB12–EB16; and G. Imperato, don: Mercury Books, 1990). Succeed and Others Fail,” HR September 1997, 530–57.
“Real Tools for Virtual Teams,” 37. K. H. T. Yu and D. M. Cable, “Un- Magazine, August 1994, 62–67; 46. O. A. Alnuaimi, L. P. Robert Jr.,
Fast Company, July 2000, 378–87. packing Cooperation in Diverse K. Hess, Creating the High-Per- and L. M. Maruping, “Team Size,
32. R. I. Sutton, “The Boss as Human Teams,” Team Performance Man- formance Team (New York: Wiley, Dispersion, and Social Loafing in
Shield,” Harvard Business Review, agement, March 2011, 63–82; A. 1987); and Katzenbach and Smith, Technology-Supported Teams: A
September 2010, 106–09; and Hy- Nederveen Pieterse, D. van Knip- “The Wisdom of Teams,” 43–64. Perspective on the Theory of Moral
att and Ruddy, “An Examination penberg, and W. P. van Ginkel, 43. H. van Emmerik, I. M. Jawahar, Disengagement”; C. Cheshire and
of the Relationship between Work “Diversity in Goal Orientation, B. Schreurs, and N. de Cuyper, J. Antin, “None of Us Is as Lazy as
Group Characteristics and Perfor- Team Reflexivity, and Team Per- “Social Capital, Team Efficacy All of Us”; R. van Dick, J. Stellm-
mance,” 577. formance,” Organizational Be- and Team Potency: The Mediating acher, U. Wagner, G. Lemmer, and
33. M. E. Palanski, S. S. Kahai, and F. havior and Human Performance, Role of Team Learning Behav- P. A. Tissington, “Group Mem-
J. Yammarino, “Team Virtues and March 2011, 153–64; M.-E. Ro- iors,” Career Development Inter- bership Salience and Task Perfor-
Performance: An Examination of berge and R. van Dick, “Recog- national (February 2011): 82– 99; mance”; A. Jassawalla, H. Sashit-
Transparency, Behavioral Integri- nizing the Benefits of Diversity: T. Lewis, “Assessing Social Iden- tal, and A. Malshe, “Students’
ty, and Trust,” Journal of Business When and How Does Diversity tity and Collective Efficacy as Perceptions of Social Loafing: Its
Ethics (March 2011): 201–16; H. Increase Group Performance,” Hu- Theories of Group Motivation Antecedents and Consequences
H. Chang, S. S. Chuang, and S. H. man Resource Management Re- at Work,” International Journal in Undergraduate Business Class-
Chao, “Determinants of Cultural view, December 2010, 295–308; of Human Resource Manage- room Teams”; K. H. Price, D. A.
Adaptation, Communication Qual- and E. Mannix and M. A. Neale, ment (February 2011): 963–80; Harrison, and J. H. Gavin, “With-
ity, and Trust in Virtual Teams’ “What Differences Make a Differ- K. Tasa, G. J. Sears, and A. C. H. holding Inputs in Team Contexts:
Performance,” Total Quality ence: The Promise and Reality of Schat, “Personality and Teamwork Member Composition, Interaction
Management and Business Excel- Diverse Teams in Organizations,” Behavior in Context: The Cross- Processes, Evaluation Structure,
lence, March 2011, 305–29; A. C. Psychological Science in the Pub- Level Moderating Role of Collec- and Social Loafing,” Journal of
Costa and N. Anderson, “Measur- lic Interest, October 2005, 31–55. tive Efficacy,” Journal of Organi- Applied Psychology (December
ing Trust in Teams: Development 38. A. Deutschman, “Inside the Mind zational Behavior (January 2011): 2006): 1375–84; and R. Albanese
and Validation of a Multifaceted of Jeff Bezos,” Fast Company, Au- 65–85; J. A. Goncalo, E. Polman, and D. D. Van Fleet, “Rational Be-
Measure of Formative and Reflec- gust 2004, 50–58. and C. Maslach, “Can Confi- havior in Groups: The Free Riding
tive Indicators of Team Trust,” 39. Hyatt and Ruddy, “An Examina- dence Come Too Soon? Collec- Tendency,” Academy of Manage-
European Journal of Work & Or- tion of the Relationship between tive Efficacy, Conflict and Group ment Review, April 1985, 244–55.
ganizational Psychology (Febru- Work Group Characteristics and Performance Over Time,” Orga- 47. SmartPulse, “If Someone on Your
ary 2011): 119–54; M. Mach, S. Performance”; J. D. Shaw, M. K. nizational Behavior & Human De- Team Hates Their Job, What Do
Dolan, and S. Tzafrir, “The Dif- Duffy, and E. M. Stark, “Inter- cision Processes, September 2010, You Do?” Smart Brief on Lead-
ferential Effect of Team Members’ dependence and Preference for 13–24; K. Tasa, S. Taggar, and ership, www.smartbrief.com/
Trust on Team Performance: The Group Work: Main and Congru- G. H. Seijts, “The Development leadership, October 21, 2014.
Mediation Role of Team Cohe- ence Effects on the Satisfaction of Collective Efficacy in Teams: 48. “Helping Hands,” HR Magazine,
sion,” Journal of Occupational and Performance of Group Mem- A Multilevel and Longitudinal May 2011, 18; M. O’Neil, “Lead-
and Organizational Psychology bers,” Journal of Management Perspective,” Journal of Applied ing the Team,” Supervision, April
(September 2010): 771–94; B. A. (June 2000): 259–79; and S. A. Psychology (January 2007): 17– 2011, 8–10; J. Beeson, “Build a
DeJong and T. Elfring, “How Does Kiffin-Peterson and J. L. Cordery, 27; C. B. Gibson, “The Efficacy Strong Team,” Leadership Excel-
Trust Affect the Performance of “Trust, Individualism, and Job Advantage: Factors Related to lence, February 2011, 15; S. Bru-
Ongoing Teams? The Mediating Characteristics of Employee Pref- the Formation of Group Efficacy,” tus and M. B. L. Donia, “Improv-
Role of Reflexivity, Monitoring, erence for Teamwork,” Interna- Journal of Applied Social Psychol- ing the Effectiveness of Students
and Effort,” Academy of Man- tional Journal of Human Resource ogy (October 2003): 2153–86; and in Groups with a Centralized Peer
agement Journal (June 2010): Management (February 2003): D. I. Jung and J. J. Sosik, “Group Evaluation System,” Academy of
535–49; M. Williams, “In Whom 93–116. Potency and Collective Efficacy: Management Learning & Educa-
We Trust: Group Membership as 40. J. S. Bunderson and P. Boum- Examining Their Predictive Valid- tion, December 2010, 652–62; and
an Affective Context for Trust De- garden, “Structure and Learning ity, Level of Analysis, and Effects N. H. Woodward, “Make the Most