Page 681 - NGTU_paper_withoutVideo
P. 681

Modern Geomatics Technologies and Applications


                  As shown in Figure 4, in case of a 7-magnitude earthquake in the North Tabriz fault, the whole city of Tabriz
               will be affected by this earthquake. Due to the severity of the earthquake and the worn texture of the north and
               east regions of Tabriz, most of the destruction of buildings is observed in these areas. Calculations indicate that
               in case of occurrence of this earthquake, 23.7% of the city's buildings will be completely destroyed and 40.1%
               will be uninhabitable and unusable, which indicates a caution for this city. The results of this analysis are similar
               to the results of research [6]. The calculation of casualties using Equation 3 also showed that 454111 people
               (28.5%) in the city would die and 597514 would be injured (37.5%). These injured people will need immediate
               medical attention.
                  The  simulated  environment  of  Tabriz  in  AnyLogic7.0.2  software  was  shown  in  Fig.  5.  In  this  dynamic
               simulation, victims, search, rescue, medical, hospital, and central agents were presented. Injured individuals were
               located in the center of the city blocks. Hospital agents located in their actual position. Besides, the distribution
               of other agents was performed randomly. Due to the high volume of computations in the simulation, each agent
               in the simulated environment was assumed 100 people in the real world, albeit this number is variable and can be
               reduced depending on the computing power of the computer used.





























                                             Fig. 5. Simulated environment in AnyLogic
                  In AnyLogic software, for each agent, in addition to defining features and functions, the work process (state
               chart) can also be specified. The simulated workflow for each factor saw shown in Fig. 6.









                                            a.                                     b.










                                                                                                         8
   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686