Page 275 - Records of Bahrain (3) (ii)_Neat
P. 275

Bahrain and the British, 1921-1922           691


      <bpy«                      T fliflgjcanup-
            From  — The Foreign .Secretary to the Government of India
                       ig thp Foroipi anat??liticaL Department, Dolhi,
            T’o  •m Tho Political R031 dont in tho Porsian Gulf, Bushiro.
            Do. 119-S.
            Dated 30th January 1922.
                 •Ifatil Govornmont of India aro satisfied that all local
            resources of bringing pressure to bear are exhausted and that
            intervention is imperative to socure protection of foreigners
            and our own position in Bahrain they aro not proparod to- consider*
            drastic intervention regarding Bahrain misrulo. Protoction of
            Bahrains would have to     Tfectivo if it is to bo of any use

            and this seems highly improbable judged by irolatod casos in tho
            immediate past. We should bo compelled to employ force if $>ur
            protection were deliberately flouted. A departuro from the
            established pci 'ey of confining protoction to foreigners would in
            any case obviously have tory far-reaching results and would call
            for most careful consideration. If Abdulla woro told to leave
       I Bahrain ho would probably ongago in intrigues from tho mainland
          ; whore his influence might bo moro dungorous than now. Govornmont
           of India will therefore be glad if at oai'liost opportunity you
          , proceed to Bahrain and during your stcy ondeavour to resto_ro_
           prestige of j\goncy_jmd to impross your personal influence on
           •Shaikh and his family.. Shaikh should bo warned that he is
           running a groat risk from his own subjects and should doarly

           understand that Government will find it most difficult to render
           him any support whatsoever if misrule leads to uprising.
            2. As regards Abdulla you should suggost that this would be a
           convenient opportunity for him to proceed on the haj without
           giving definite warning that Government might bo for cod with
           repetition of their action in 1905 when ALi Ahmed was deported.
          I b You should warn Hamad that on his conduct now will obviously
    r4/M//^ldoPond bis ovontual recognition as Shaik. The Shaikh*s uneasiness
           reported in vour last letter appears to hold out. that success may
     ' AM -                                        ^
           attend your personal intervention on somjsuch lines as these.

                                                                     This






                                                                                            .
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280