Page 359 - Records of Bahrain (7) (i)_Neat
P. 359

Administration, 1957                   345

        CONFIDENTIAL,


                                BAHRAIN.
  Flag A      With Ills'lottor of March 19 to Mr. Ormsby-Qoro, Col.Cough M.P.
         onclosod a long lottor to him from Sir Charles Bolgravo, the
         Advisor to tho Rulor of Bahrain. In this letter Sir C.Bolgravo
         says . that the Ruler does not roally wish him to retire as
         arrangod this summer and ho goes on to glvo a tondontlous account
         of ovonts in Bahrain during tlia loot two years alleging that If
         tho Residency had given tho Rulor proper support at tho boginning
         of tho troubles tho Rulor could have suppressed tho Committee of
         National Union at a much earlier dato and have avoided the riots
         and damage which resulted from their activities.

         2.   In his letter Col. Gough says that while recognising that
         Sir O.Belgrave "Is not the man ho was" , he thinks it most unwise
         that wo should try at thiB time to force tho Rulor 11 to part with
         his best friend".
         3.   In view of tho serious allegations made by Sir C.Bolgravo
         about the policy of H.M.G. In Bahrain and about tho attitude of
         the Residency in particular, I thought it well before drafting
         a reply to Col. Gough, to obtain tho commonts of tho Political
         Reoldont. These are now available (eoe Sir B.Burrows's lottor of
   Flag BApril 4 - EA 1016/54) and they reaffirm the view which Sir B.Burrowa
  “Ibvl has always expressed and with which In the Department we have
      " agreed, that:
               (a) earlier action against tho C.N.U. would have alienated
                   tho moderate elements on Y/hom tho stability of Bahrain                  I
                   rests;
          and (b) by persuading the Ruler to make reasonable reforms and to
                   glvo time for the more extreme domands of the Committee to
                   disgust moderate opinion we have ensured that there was In
                   fact a very wide measure of support in N0vembor for the
                   action eventually taken by the Rulor against the C.N.U.
         4.    Any postponement of tho departure of Sir C.Bolgravo might
         alienate Just those moderate elements who have accepted the
         dissolution of the C.N.U. with relief. They would conclude that
          the Rulor has no Intention of reorganising tho administration of
         Balirain on more progressive lines and that the oxtreme policy
         advocated by tho C.N.U. had been right all along. Sir B.Burrowa
         has already reported the growth of doubts about the Ruler's
          Intentions amongst tho moderate merchants, and there seems little
         doubt that these would be greatly Intensified if Sir O.Belgrave's
         departure were postponed. Wo do not want the situation of the
         summer of 1956 to build- up again when the alternatives seemed to bo
         Either to thro?/ Bolgrave overboard or to have no Bahraini friends.
         5.     I submit a reply to Col. Gough drafted by Mr. Moberly, which
         explains in detail our view of the wisdom of the waiting tactics
         which wo persuaded the Ruler to employ in relation to the C.N.U.
         and  stressing the Importance of Bolgrave keoplng to his plan to
         leave Bahrain this June, I have assumed that It is possible to
         writo with considerable frankness and at length.
         6.    I shall submit separately Borne recent papers on constitutional
          reform in Bahrain with which the question of the r     rement of
         8lr O.Belgrave Is intimately connected.            (

                                          L           (D.M.H. Riches)
                                                       11 April. 1957.
   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364