Page 18 - ver3

Not Satisfactory Satisfactory
Levels of Evaluation
Non-
Full
Minimal
NA Compliance Compliance Substantial Compliance
Compliance
Elements of Evaluation 1 2 3 4
research, administrative, and service fields and
activities.
*
The program management applies the systems,
regulations, and procedures that are approved
1-1-9 by the institution/college, including those √
related to grievance, complaints, and
disciplinary cases.

1-2 Program Quality Assurance

The program management implements an
effective quality assurance and management
1-2-1 √
system that is consistent with the institution
quality system.
The program analyzes the key performance
indicators and the evaluation data annually and
1-2-2 √
results are used in planning, development, and
decision-making processes. *

The program conducts a
periodic, comprehensive
1-2-3 √
evaluation and prepares plans for improvement;
and follows up its implementation.

Overall Evaluation of the Standard

Total Sum of Evaluation of Criteria (4+3+3+4+3+3+3+3+3+4+3+3)
(Total Sum of Points) 39

Number of Applicable Criteria 12

Average Evaluation of the Standard 39/12=3.25

Overall Quality Rating of the Standard 3

* Essential Criteria

Comments on Results:
The self-evaluation of standard No. 1 using the self-rating scale showed that all criterion criteria
were rated from three to four stars for 12 elements. All areas of the standard elements were
implemented through regular evaluation and the evaluation results showed (Substantial
compliance /Full compliance) level.

18