Page 22 - ver3

performance evaluation for faculty member and employee, Annex S1-1-2-5). Through this form,

the faculty members are evaluated as follows:

Section One: Instructional duties.
Section Two: Participation in program and course development and implementation of quality

models

Section Three: Personal qualities and skills.
Section Four: Research and career development.

Section Five: Participation in committees and administrative work.

Section six: Community and university service.

The assessment is based on all sections according to their ratings. The average is calculated by

dividing the sum of ratings by the number of factors.
Table S1-1-2-2: Faculty members are evaluated use the following Table scale

The average Rating
4.5 or higher Excellent

3.5 to less than 4.5 Good
2.5 to less than 3.5 Average
1.5 to less than 2.5 Poor
1.5 or less Unsatisfactory

Also, official committees are formed, and tasks are distributed related to the program’s self-study

to all faculty members in the department according to the documents and it was approved by the

scientific department council of the meeting attached to the following (Annex S1-1-2-6). The

program has an academic advising committee that takes care of student affairs, students are
divided among all faculty members to carry out these tasks (Annex S1-1-2-7). The faculty member

and their loads are listed as shown (Annex S1-1-2-8), and its approval in Mechanical engineering

department council No.1, topic No.5 (Annex S1-1-2-9). Samples of the schedules of faculty

members are listed (Annex S1-1-2-10). The extent of teaching staff satisfaction can also be
measured by questionnaire the job satisfaction of teaching staff (Annex S1-1-2-11), the average

result of the Job satisfaction questionnaire among faculty members in a Mechanical engineering

program is 3.54 on a 5-point scale. The highest rating was for the item “respect and appreciation”

among my work colleagues, this creates a collaborative environment in the scientific department,
which helps to complete work and innovation.

22