Page 126 - BBLP ejournal2018.docx
P. 126

วารสารเทคโนโลยีชีวภาพการผลิตปศุสัตว์



              Box F* represented BoF2 (forward primer for cattle in PCR reaction)
              Box G* represented BuF1 (forward primer for buffalo in PCR reaction)
              Box H* represented ComR (reverse primer for goat in PCR reaction)


              PCR amplification of cyt b fragments

                     The PCR reactions of DNA extracted from 6 animal species (cattle, buffalo, goat, sheep,

              chicken, and pig) using cyt b forward and reverse primers (Table 1) resulted in 6 different length
              fragments (Figure 2) from buffalo, goat, chicken, pig sheep, and cattle as 124, 157, 227, 331, 398,


              and 473 bp, respectively. In order to distinguish if the primers were specific to testing samples,
              sequence  analysis of the  PCR products  of all  samples (10 samples from each species) was

              performed which the results revealed similarity of each spp. sequences in Figure 1. (Data not shown)























              Figure 2 Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products amplified from the 6 species as followed Bu: buffalo; G:

              goat; Ch: chicken; P: pig; Sh: sheep; C: cattle, indicated PCR product sizes as 124, 157, 227, 331, 398, and 473
              bp, respectively, and Lane M: 100 bp molecular DNA marker.


              Quantification of mixed DNA

                     The amount of 20 ng/µl of DNA extracted from cattle, chicken, and pig was mixed for using

              as templates in 2 different PCR reactions which were the mixture of cattle and pig and the mixture

              of chicken and pig with the ratios of cattle/chicken’s DNA to pig’s DNA as 1:0, 1:1, 1:0.5, 1:0.25,

              1:0.1, 1:0.05, 1:0.025, 1:0.01, and 0:1(v/v). Figure 3demonstrated the PCR product bands of cattle

              and pig-specific fragments of 473 and 331 bp. Pig DNA fragments could be detected at the highest

              intensity at 1:1 DNA ratio (lane 3) then faded away as the pig DNA concentration decreased to the
              ratio of cattle: pig was 1:0.01 (v/v) which equivalent to the concentration of 20 ng of cattle DNA and



                                                           116
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131