Page 71 - EVOLUTION OF THE SUDAN PEOPLE’S LIBERATION MOVEMENT(SPLM),
P. 71

political experience to oversee the political transition and at the same time undertake economic
          and social transformation.  The political rivalry between General Salva Kiir and Riek Machar
          resurfaced just as the transition period was underway except that it did not openly explode into

          open  conflict until  its maturity  in  December 15th 2013.  Continuous rivalry between  General
          Salva  Kiir  and  Riek  Machar  took the  center  stage as  SPLM  navigated crisis  after  the other
          culminating in arms violence in Juba in 2013 and 2016 during the implementation process of the
          IGAD’s Agreement for Resolution of Conflict in South Sudan, ARCSS.

          The path towards the implementation of the CPA was riddled with a number of hurdles. There

          were those who argued that the peace process was flawed and had a number of weaknesses while
          others argued that CPA addressed the core problems of the Sudan civil war. Rigalo and Morrison
          (2007) observes that the CPA did not address the underlying causes of the conflict because among
          other factors did not possess proper mechanisms to ensure implementation of CPA.  Furthermore,
          it excluded other armed and political organizations from the negotiations including organs of the

          civil society. The fact that it did not present solution to the political and legal inequality between
          the North and South raised doubts about its implementation. Finally, there was no enforcement
          plan in case of non-adherence to the protocols.  The question of the status of Border States in

          South Kordofan, Abyei’s Ngok Dinka, the Nuba Mountains and South Blue Nile, added new
          dimension into the process.

          The implementation of the process did not consider an affirmative schedule, committing
          the National Congress Party, NCP, and SPLM, but the parties instead, remained immovable
          and bettered in a poorly managed administration, lack of communications, absence of basic

          infrastructure, lack of funds and natural disasters among others. However, the SPLM government
          was expected to develop legislation and state machinery to implement the CPA. The formulation
          of foreign policy and ministry, decentralization, adoption of the interim constitution and creation
          of security agencies were essential ingredients of success.  The government in a nutshell had to
          have a base in Juba before establishment across the country in diverse forms.  The legislative

          power and planning for delivery of services such as education, health, welfare and reconstruction
          of the South Sudan was a factor in harvesting peace dividends and reconstruction of the south as
          a whole.




          5.2.2 Government policy formulation

          The government had to formulate and implement policies through legislation;  presidential
          decrees together with identity programs that could enable the government acquire legitimacy and

          connect with the local people.  Education, agriculture and infrastructure development policies
          are relevant because it was through education that the government would lower the levels of
          illiteracy. Land was communally owned and a symbol of collective identity.

          The question of policy formulation and implementation was discussed at the second SPLM national
          convention in 2008. The purpose of the convention  was to  put forward clear post war vision

          and ideology for the party. The promotion of civic ideology over militarism was highlighted.
          Leadership squabbles and differences over New Sudan and South Sudan independence resurfaced

                                                           65
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76