Page 228 - BUKU SYNOPSIS
P. 228

F.   Limitations and Further Research



                        The design and development of the multipurpose assessment model for blended

                        learning of argumentative writing followed as closely as possible the procedures


                        and  phases  outlined  in  Plomp's  research-design  model.  However,  in  its

                        implementation,  there  are  several  shortcomings  that  result  in  implementation

                        limitations for the established assessment model. The limitations includes:



                           1.  Product Limitation

                               This model only included topics that students were already familiar with as


                               writing prompts. If the student is given any topics, the outcomes could be

                               different.  For  this  reason,  future  research  can  incorporate  any  topic  and


                               topics that students are familiar with.

                           2.  Research Limitations


                                  a)  Students encountered challenges while performing self-assessment

                                      (SA) and peer assessment (PA) due to their lack of prior experience

                                      with  these  activities.  Efficient  utilization  of  SA  and  PA  can  be


                                      achieved through adequate training. Thus, mentoring students is the

                                      first step in the SA and PA activities, which must be implemented in


                                      all courses as part of a structured learning process.

                                  b)  Both  students  and  lecturers  have  challenges  when  attempting  to


                                      assess student learning progress after receiving corrective feedback

                                      through self-assessment (SA), peer assessment (PA), and lecturer


                                      feedback. This is due to the need for careful analysis of each draft

                                      to evaluate the progress made. To  facilitate future investigations,




                                                              220
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233