Page 223 - BUKU SYNOPSIS
P. 223

use and beneficial system for preserving and sharing course materials, and they


                            supported its implementation in university classrooms.

                                      The lecturers is also interested in using Google Drive and Google Docs

                            for  thesis  supervision.  The  idea  is  in  line  with  the  study  by  (Jaldemark  &


                            Linberg,  2013),  who  found  that  technological  applications  to  mediate


                            undergraduate students' dissertations are beneficial for both one-on-one and

                            collaborative supervision.





                        E.   The Advantages or Novelty of the Model


                                  As elaborated in the preceding chapter, the integrated Aal, AfL, and AoL-


                        based  assessment  model  in  the  EFL  context  has  demonstrated  efficacy  in

                        evaluating, developing, and enhancing students' writing abilities, notwithstanding


                        certain limitations, according to empirical evidence. As an illustration, the model's

                        implementation is presently restricted to partial implementation, and the integration

                        of the Aal, AfL, and AoL models in a holistic manner remains non-operational,


                        resulting in an unsystematic approach to providing feedback.

                                  Previous related research findings demonstrate the validity of implementing


                        self- and peer-assessment in EFL writing contexts, specifically regarding fairness.

                        For example, studies by Mazloomi & Khabiri (2016), Liu & Brantmeier (2019),


                        and Wanner & Palmer (2018) support this notion. When students engage in self-

                        assessment,  there  are  circumstances  where  they  either  overestimate  or


                        underestimate  the  quality  of  their  writing  draughts.  Moreover,  certain  students

                        exhibit  a  pessimistic  disposition  toward  the  feedback  provided  by  their  peers.




                                                              218
   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228