Page 313 - วารสารกฎหมาย ศาลอุทธรณ์คดีชํานัญพิเศษ
P. 313

ฉบับพิเศษ ประจำ�ปี 2564



                          Doctrine of Employer Condonation

                         with Some Misconducts of Employees


                                         in Labour Cases





                                                              Dr. Manuchest  Rojjanasiributr

                       Judge in the Research Division and Secretary of the Labour Case Division

                                                    of the Court of Appeal for Specialized Cases





                                                Abstract



                    This article aims to present the concept, theory of employer condonation
            (Doctrine of Employer Condonation) in labour cases, which have been accepted principle
            in the common law system in disputes concerning the dismissal of the offending

            employee, since 1889. This theory was intended to prevent employers from terminating
            employees for misconducts that employers had not paid attention to, or had already

            forgiven employees, to provide more fairness in disputed cases regarding the dismissal
            of offending employees. There were three important elements of the concept of this
            theory: the employer has full knowledge of the employee’s misconduct; the employer

            is too late for the normal period in exercising the right to dismiss the employee or
            inordinate delay, that is the employer does not take any actions to terminate the

            employee’s employment within a reasonable period of time; and the employer has an
            express or implied behaviour to condones that misconduct.
                    This paper analyzes the concept, theory of employer condonation with some

            misconducts of employees in labour cases as cases study scenario. The first one, in the
            event that the employee violates the work regulations, rules or orders of the employer

            which is lawful and fair, in serious cases which the employer has not immediately
            terminated the employment of that employee and the employee has continued to work




                                                                                             311
   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318