Page 32 - test
        P. 32
     Ref  : CM-DFH4-2014-1
                                                    BEAZLEY                   Issue : 1
                                               DFH 4 Series Spacecraft        Date : 28 Sept 2014
                                                                                                Page 30 of 38
                 CHINASAT 18             Observation                    Comment /Assessment          Cri
                               Mass budget,                      EPS,  mass  is  615KG,  what  is  behind  this
                                                                    colossal number?
                               Propellant budget, no comment     No comment at this stage
                               Power budget,.                    !5 KW capability need to be demonstrated.
                   System      TCR Link budget, no comment       No comment at this stage
                  budgets
                               Antenna pointing accuracy, no comment   No comment at this stage
                               Reliability, 0.731 end of life, seems optimistic   No comment at this stage
                                with the TWT redundancy proposed.
                               SPF list (page 26), seems incomplete, many   Should be updated  later
                                other SPF can be added.
                               Page 29-. According to the presentation most   It  is  understood that  the  entire  payload  will  be
                                of the hardware is qualified, or flight proven.  under TAS responsibility but the payload design
                                15.36 % of the hardware is in category C. This  is  still  in  preliminary  phase,  therefore  it  is
                                is addressing only the platform, what about the  difficult to evaluate at this stage.
                                payload ?                         Mechanical,  electrical  and  thermal  interfaces
                                    No unqualified technology;     between CAST and TAS will be clearly defined
                                    No new design units;           in  the  contract.  Therefore  it  is  premature  to
                                    Platform Minor modification units, C  evaluate it.
                                     ≈15.36%;
                                    Platform No modification units, D ≈   Page  48:.  Many  items  have  to  be  qualified  (in
                                     84.64%.                        2014)
                 Qualification
                    status
                               Page 39. Solar array manufacturer TIPS ? It   Seems to be a new design, qualification need to
                                seems that it is a new manufacturer  be demonstrated.
                                (Qualification 09 2014) 4 panels.
                               Page 41, not yet qualified2. Li Ion batteries cell   Experience on LEO is difficult to extrapolate on
                                45 Ah, bat 135 Ah                   GEO.
                               Page 43. SADM, significant change,   Item at risk.
                                qualification end of 2014
                               Page 50.  Significant  evolution  in comparison   Comment see remarks on each subsystem
                  Platform      with  DFH-4  which  need  to  be  proven  and
                  overview      qualified.
                               No détails provided               Some doubts on the capability to handle 15 KW.
                                          Table 10-b Chinasat 18 technical assessment
             This document is proprietary of BEAZLEY© and must be treated on a confidential basis. It may be used solely by BEAZLEY, use or reproduction, of the document and the
                                  Contained therein, for any other purposes without BEAZLEY written consent is prohibited.





