Page 281 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא הכוס יניד “ ו - מק ללכ ייח

163 .םי ִפָּע ְּר ָּה רי ִס ֵה ְּו ה ֶשֲע ַמ ה ָּשָּע ֶ ׁש ןָּויֵּכ ּור ְּ ׁש ְּכ ֻה ן ָּמ ְּצַע םי ִצ ֵע ָּה ְּד ,ן ָּמ ְּצַע םי ִצ ֵע ָּה ת ַח ַּת

ּ
ם ִא לָּבא ֲ 164 .םי ִחָּפ ְּט 'ג תֹוחָּפְּל ֹוא םי ִחָּפ ְּט 'ד ד ָּח ֶא לָּּכ ןיֵּב הֶי ְּהִּי ֶ ׁש םי ִרי ִמ ְּח ַמ ׁשֵי ְּו
ְּ
ְּ
ֹ
ּ
בַּג לַע ף ַאד ְּ ּ 161 ,לּוסָּ ּפ ךָּכ ְּס ןי ִד ם ֶהָּל ׁשֵי םי ִצ ֵע ָּה ן ָּתֹוא ז ָּא ,םי ִפָּע ְּר אל ְּב ךָּּכ ה ָּתְּי ָּה
ּ
ְּ
ֹל
ּ
ם ֵה י ֵרֲה ,לֵצ ם ֵ ׁשְּל אּ ֶ ׁש ם ָּ ׁש ם ָּחיִנ ִה ֶ ׁש ןָּויֵּכ םֹוק ָּמ לָּּכ ִמ ,ר ֵ ׁשָּּכ ךָּכ ְּס ם ֵה ת ֶמֱאֶב ְּד
ּ
ּ
ג"ל ן ָּמי ִס ְּב ןָּלי ִא ָּה ת ַח ַּת ֶ ׁש הָּּכ ֻס ןי ִד ְּכ םָּני ִד ְּו ,יּוֹשָּע ֶה ן ִמ אל ְּו ה ֶשֲע ַּת םּו ּ ׁש ִמ םיִלּוס ְּּפ
ּ
ֹ

ְּ
ּ
א"מ לָּבֲא .םי ִחָּפ ְּט 'ג ן ֶהיֵניֵּב ןי ֵא ם ִא ר ֵסֹוא ח"בה ,ם ֶהיֵלֲע ךָּכ ְּּס ַה ַחיִנ ַמ ם ִא ְּו .ש"ע
ּ
166 :ו"כ ן ָּמי ִס לי ֵעְּל ִד ְּכ ר ֵתֹוי ם ֶהיֵניֵּב חַו ֶר ׁשֵי ם ִא ןי ִרי ִת ַמ ר"או
ּ
ְּ
ְּ
ְּ
ּ
ןָּויֵכ ְּד ,ה ָּר ֵ ׁשכ , ְּּ ךֵּכ ַסְּל םי ִחָּפ ְּט 'ד ךֹות ְּב אּוה ם ִא ,יֹונְּל ךָּכ ְּּס ַה ת ַח ַּת ןי ִדָּס סרפ ֵ ֵּ ]ול[
ּ
ְּ
ְּ
ּ
יֵנ ְּפ ִב ל ֶהֹא יֵוֲה ,םי ִחָּפ ְּט 'ד ךָּכ ְּּס ַה ן ִמ קֹוח ָּר אּוה םאו ִ ְּ 167 .ךָּכ ְּס יֵּבַגְּל ל ֵטָּּב ,יֹונְּל אּוה ֶ ׁש
םדו רשב
requires a space of four tefachim between the understands that removing the shingles is
support beams. He reasons that while never sufficient, and so the support beams
removing the shingles is indeed considered a remain posul. Furthermore, if there is less than
sufficient enough action to render the beams three tefachim between each of these beams,
as kosher s’chach, this creates a situation in the rule of lavud is applied and it is viewed as
which there are actually two separate layers of a single solid board which is posul for s’chach.
s’chach, and is posul like one succah on top of The Bach holds this to be true even if the
another. The poskim are not concerned with s’chach is placed directly on top of the beams,
fulfilling this opinion (Shaar Hatziyun). essentially filling in the gaps with kosher
s’chach. In this case however, the consensus of
165. Such is the case with rafters which the poskim (see Mishna Berura) is to side with
serve to support the structure, but are set well the Magen Avraham who wonders why this
below the roof. Since these were not placed should be and holds it to be kosher. אמק The
there to provide shade, they are not valid as poskim (Elya Raba, Mishna Berura) follow the
s’chach and the removal of the shingles from ruling of the Magen Avraham.
the roof which is higher up cannot be
considered an action done to the rafters 167. The mishna (Succah 10a) teaches that
themselves and therefore does not render if one spreads out a sheet under his s’chach to
them kosher. catch falling particles of s’chach, he has
invalidated the succah. The gemara however
166. See above, note 164 that the Bach qualifies that this only problematic if he

280