Page 384 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782
P. 384

Chayei Adam - K’lal 149 - Pesulim of Daled Minim & Pesulim of the Lulav


              ]3[    Since  the  Torah  writes  “Pri  Eitz  Hadar”  Chazal  understand  that  although
              there  is  a  general  concept  of  glorifying  mitzvos,  [usually]  this  is  to  serve  as  an
                                                                  10
              addition to the mitzva (mitzva min ha’muvchar).  However, regarding the arba
              minim, the Torah requires beauty. Species that are not deemed beautiful may not
              be  used  to  fulfill  the  mitzva  at  all.  Although  the  word  “hadar”  appears  only  in
              connection to the esrog, where it says “pri eitz hadar” (a beautiful fruit of the tree),
              nevertheless,  since  all  four  species  appear  in  the  same  posuk,  the  lesson  is
                                                          11
              extended  to  include  all  four  [of  them].   However,  since  the  Torah  does  not
                                                                                      12
              specify what determines beauty, Chazal were charged with the task  of defining
              these criteria. 13

              ]4[    There  is  another  invalidating  factor  of  Torah  origin  that  applies  to  all
              mitzvos  known  as  “mitzva  ha’ba  ba’aveira”  -  when  a  sin  facilitates  the
              performance of the mitzva. [In the case of lulav] this means that one attempts to
              fulfill the mitzva with a lulav that he stole. 14


              ]5[    There  are  six  invalidating  factors  in  the  four  species:   (1)  one  who  [does
                                         15
                                                                                               16
              not] have all four species;   (2) [the species] do not bear their proper names;   (3)
                                                        םדו רשב
              Therefore, although one may borrow another   the  ‘hadar’  fruit,  it  implies  that  it  must  be
              person’s lulav on chol ha’moed, using a stolen   beautiful by definition. (See Succah 31a.)
              one is problematic anytime. See below 152:12
              for a further discussion of the matter.      11.    Except  according  to  R’  Yehuda  who
                                                           limits  this  lesson  to  the  esrog  itself,  Chazal
              10.    In  the  shiras  ha’yam,  the  posuk   understand  that  since  all  four  species  are
              (Shemos 15:2) declares: “This is my God and I   mentioned in the same posuk, ‘hadar’ applies
              will glorify Him”, which Chazal (Shabbos 133b)   to  the  lulav,  hadasim,  and  aravos,  as  well
              understand  to  mean  that  we  must  enhance   (Succah  31a.  See  Levush  and  Shulchan  Aruch
              our  mitzvos  by  making  a  beautiful  succah,   HaRav ).
                                                                 ז
              beautiful tzitzis, beautiful sefer Torah, etc. This
              is  a  general  concept  applied  to  mitzvos  in   12.   See  the  Chasam  Sofer  (Chidushim,
              general and often,  one should be encouraged   Succah 31a).
                                                                      ח
                              ו
              to spend more money in order to enhance his
              mitzva. Although this applies to all mitzvos as   13.   This  indeed  occupies  much  of  the
              an ideal, since the Torah refers to the esrog as   discussion  in  the  coming  pages  as  to  what




               384
   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389