Page 385 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא בלול ילוספו בלולבש םינימ ‘ דב םילוספה ןיד - ט “ מק ללכ ייח

ּ
ּ
בי ִת ְּכ תֹוו ְּצ ִּמ ַה לָּכ ְּב ִד בַּג לַע ף ַא ְּד ל"ַז ֲח ּול ְּב ִק ,"ר ָּד ָּה ץ ֵע י ִר ְּּפ" בי ִת ְּכ ִדמּו ִ [ ]ג
ּ
ּ
ּ
ה ָּרֹו ּת ַה ה ָּדי ִּפ ְּק ִה ןיִני ִמ 'ד ְּב לָּבֲא .ר ָּח ְּב ֻּמ ַה ן ִמ הָּו ְּצ ִמְּל ּונְּי ַה , ]ב,וט תומש[ " ֵוְּנ ַא ְּו"
ּ
ּוה
ּ
ֹ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
י ִר ְּּפ" בי ִת ְּכ ִד ְּכ גֹור ְּת ֶא ְּב ק ַר ר ָּד ָּה בי ִת ְּכ אל ְּד בַּג לַע ף ַא ְּו .ר ָּד ָּה ןָּני ִעָּּב ,בֵּכ ַעְּל ּו ּ ל ִפֲא ַד
ר ָּד ָּה ןַני ִעָּבּו ֹורֵבֲח ֵמ ד ָּח ֶא ןַני ִפְּלָּי ,ד ָּח ֶא קּוסָּפ ְּב ןָּּ לֻּכ ֶ ׁש ןָּויֵּכ םֹוק ָּמ לָּּכ ִמ ,"ר ָּד ָּה ץ ֵע
ּ
ּ
םי ִמָּכ ֲחַל ה ָּרֹו ּת ַה ה ָּר ְּס ָּמ ןֵּכ לַע ,ר ָּד ָּה אּוה ה ַמ ה ָּרֹו ּת ַה ה ָּ ׁש ְּרֵּפ אּ ֶ ׁש ןָּויֵכ ְּו .ןָּּ לֻכ ְּב
ֹל
:ם ָּּת ְּע ַד ִמ ּו ׁש ְּרָּפְּי ם ֵה ֶ ׁש
ּ
ה ָּרֵבֲעַּב ה ָּאָּּב ַה הָּו ְּצ ִמ אי ִה ְּו ,תֹוו ְּצ ִּמ ַה לָּכ ְּב ג ֵהֹוּנ ַה ה ָּרֹו ּת ַה ן ִמ לּוס ְּּפ ׁשֵי דֹוע ]ד[
ּ
:בָּלּול לַזָּּג ֶ ׁש ןֹוג ְּכ ה ָּרֵבֲע י ֵדְּי לַע הָּו ְּצ ִּמ ַה ה ֶשֹוע ֶ ׁש
ּ

ּ
ֹומ ְּ ׁש ןי ֵא )ב 11 .ןיִני ִמ ' ּד ַה לָּּכ ֹול ּוי ְּהִּי ֶ ׁש )א .'ו ם ֵה םיִני ִמ 'ד ְּב ןיִלּוס ְּּפ ַה אָּצמנ ְּ ִ ]ה [
םדו רשב
invalidates a lulav, esrog, hadasim, and aravos. (Raavad, Tosfos, Rosh) however rule like R’
Although Chazal themselves list many things Yochanan that one may never use a stolen
which will invalidate one of the species, the lulav, and the Rema codifies this opinion as
exact case to which they refer is disputed by halacha. If, however, the original owner
the rishonim, and often the reason for it (i.e. relinquished his rights to it (by giving up on
because it is not hadar or is missing a piece, finding it) and it subsequently changed hands,
etc) is also unclear. one may fulfill his obligation with it. Many
ט
poskim however advise against making a
14. The mishna (Succah 29b) teaches that beracha on it, and one should therefore use
a stolen lulav is posul. Although Shmuel another lulav.
(Succah 30a) understands that the mishna only
refers to the first day of Succos, when one 15. Mishna (Menachos 27a. See below
must own his lulav, R’ Yochanan explains that siman 7 for further discussion of this).
a stolen lulav is posul on chol ha’moed as well, Nevertheless, if one is unable to obtain all four
since it is a mitzva ha’ba ba’aveira (a mitzva species (i.e. they are not available locally,
which was facilitated by sin). While the whatsoever), there are still two reasons to take
Rambam and Shulchan Aruch rule like Shmuel י the two or three species he has available: (1)
they agree that one may not recite a beracha See Succah (31a) that R’ Yehuda maintains that
on a stolen lulav, and doing so is considered a a dry lulav is valid and people would in fact
curse and not a blessing. Many rishonim use the same lulav for years. The Chachamim
אי
disagree and understand that they only did so

385