Page 389 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא בלול ילוספו בלולבש םינימ ‘ דב םילוספה ןיד - ט “ מק ללכ ייח

ּ
ּ
םֹוי ְּב ן ַדי ִדְּל א ָּמְּלָּע יֵּ לֻכְּלּו ,ה ָּרֹו ּת ַה ן ִמ אּוה םי ִמָּּי ַה 'ז לָּּכ ֶ ׁש ׁש ָּד ְּק ִּמַב ְּד ּוהְּל א ָּרי ִב ְּס ִד
ּ
ּ
ּ
יֵּ לֻכְּל םי ִמָּּי ַה ר ָּא ְּ ׁש ִבּו .א ָּתְּי ַרֹוא ְּד ִמ ןיִל ְּסֹופּו ןיִגֲהֹונ ןָּּ לֻּכ ,א ָּתְּי ַרֹוא ְּד ִמ אּוה ֶ ׁש ןֹו ׁשא ִר
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ר ֵ ׁשָּּכ א ָּמְּלָּע יֵּ לֻכְּל ר ֵס ָּח ןֵכ ְּו .ן ָּּמ ַקְּל לּוזָּג ְּו לּוא ָּ ׁש ְּד ןי ִד ר ֵאָּבְּנ ֶ ׁש ֹומ ְּכ ר ֵ ׁשָּּכ לּוא ָּ ׁש א ָּמְּלָּע
ֹוא ויָּלָּע ֹומ ְּ ׁש ןי ֵא ֶ ׁש ֹוא םיִני ִּמ ַה ן ִמ ד ָּח ֶא ֹול ר ֵס ָּח ֶ ׁש ת ַמֲח ֵמ לּוסָּ ּפ ַה ְּו .םי ִמָּּי ַה ר ָּא ְּ ׁש ִב
ּ
ּ

ר ָּד ָּה ְּבּו .הָּע ְּב ִ ׁש לָּּכ ןָּנָּּב ַר ְּד ִמ לּוסָּ ּפ א ָּמְּלָּע יֵּ לֻכְּל ,רּוע ִ ׁש ֹו ּב ןי ֵא ֶ ׁש ֹוא הָּפ ֵר ְּשִל ד ֵמֹוע ֶ ׁש
ֹ
ּ
ף ַא ְּד םי ִק ְּסֹו ּפ ׁשֵי ְּו .ןֹו ׁשא ִרָּּב אָּּ ל ֶא ג ֵהֹונ ֹוני ֵא םי ִק ְּסֹו ּפ ַה ברְּל ִד ,םי ִק ְּסֹו ּפ ַה ּוקְּל ְּחֶנ
ּ
ְּ
יִנ ֵ ׁש בֹוט םֹויו ְּ 2 1 םי ִק ְּסֹו ּפ ַה בר לַע ךמ ְּסִל ׁשֵי ק ָּח ְּד ַה תַע ְּ ׁש ִבּו .'ז לָּּכ ג ֵהֹונ ר ָּד ָּה
ֹ
ֹ
ּ
ּ
ןֵכָּלו ְּ 26 .םי ִמָּי ר ָּא ְּ ׁש ִכ םי ִר ְּמֹוא ׁשֵי ְּו ,ןֹו ׁשא ִרָּּכ ֹוני ִד ְּד םי ִר ְּמֹוא ׁשֵי ,םי ִק ְּסֹו ּפ ַה םי ִקָּּ ל ֻח ְּמ
ּ
םדו רשב
commands us to take the arba minim in the because it is like the esrog is missing a piece,
Beis HaMikdash every day of Succos, a set one can rely on the Taz’s ruling, but not for
which is missing a part or otherwise inferior is anything which is definitely disqualified from
valid there on chol ha’moed as well. being hadar. Although the Elya Rabba agrees
with this, the Shulchan Aruch HaRav does
כ
23. 152:12 See also above, note 14. not, and the Chayei Adam here is only
אכ
lenient under extenuating circumstances. This
24. As the mitzva of arba minim then, is also appears to be the ruling of the Mishna
only by rabbinic enactment. Berura.
בכ

25. See below (k’lal 151 siman 8-9) 26. Meaning, outside of Eretz Yisroel,
regarding a ‘chazazis’ which developed on an where the second day of Succos is observed as
esrog. The Ran explains that since this doesn’t a yom tov, in case they had erred in calculating
qualify as hadar, it is posul the entire Succos. the calendar. (See above, Hilchos Rosh
Yet, the Ran himself writes elsewhere that Hashana, k’lal 139, note 88). Accordingly, the
hadar is only a requirement on the first day. halachos of the second day should be exactly
Because of this, the Taz rules that one may the same as those of the first (Rosh). The
rely on the majority opinion and make a Rambam however writes that all of the
beracha on a lulav or esrog, etc. which is not invalidating criteria apply on the first day of
hadar (on chol ha’moed). The Magen Avraham Succos only. The Shulchan Aruch rules in
disagrees and upholds the Rema’s ruling that accordance with the Rosh, but writes that if
hadar is a requirement for the entire Succos. one is unable to obtain a fully kosher set, he
See however the Pri Megadim who rules that should use his incomplete set without a
since some hold that a chazazis is posul beracha.

389