Page 12 - FREN-C2021 PROCEEDINGS

Testing
In terms of software testing, a total of three tests have been performed; unit testing, integration testing,
and system testing, as depicted in Table 1. Based on the result, the system passed all the tests and is
ready for market distribution.

Table 1. Testing and Evaluation of i-Jury
Stage Test Source Result
Unit Testing Black-Box Passed
White-box System Specification Passed
Integration Testing User Interface Menu and Interface Design Passed
Data Flow Logical/relational ERD Passed
System Interface System Flowchart Passed
System Testing Requirement System functions and features Passed
Usability Menu and interface Passed
Security Login page and session Passed
Performance System functions and features Passed
Documentation User documentation/ manual Passed

Conclusion
The study was conducted with two purposes, first, to propose automation workflow for event
management in the context of innovation exhibition and second, to briefly explained the design and
development of a new secretariat management system. To answer the first purpose, we perform
content analysis on similar topics, as well as conducting a Joint Application Design (JAD) session
with several respondents. Findings were formulated into an automation workflow that can help the
new organizer to: (1) identify the best possible workflow, (2) improve the efficiency of project
management, (3) reduce stress and depression among secretariat members, (4) reduce processing time,
and (5) enhance user engagement due to reducing repetitive task and focusing on important matters.

For the second purpose, Rapid Application Development (RAD) methodology was used for the
development of the information system. The use of RAD methodology speeds up the development
process, reduces overhead costs, and improves the efficiency of the product. Findings show that the
development of an information system to automate the secretarial task helps to (1) reduce processing
time, (2) improve the accuracy of the information, (3) reduce workloads, and (4) reduce manpower
usage.

This study is not without a limitation. First, data was collected based on the qualitative method.
Further study should employ quantitative study to further understanding the fundamental issues
related to event management. Second, we adopted RAD methodology instead of more popular
methodology such as System Development Lifecycle (SDLC). We suggest future studies that
employed SDLC methodology and compare its findings with our results. Third, the study did not look
upon theoretical contributions such as the research model. We suggest that future studies include the
development of a research model and identify the current situation or level of the event management
industry in the post-COVID pandemic. However, underneath all the limitations, we can conclude that
our research has met both purposes and may be appealing to several stakeholders such as
academicians, industrial practitioners, and software developers.

[7]