Page 203 - Veterinary Toxicology, Basic and Clinical Principles, 3rd Edition
P. 203

170 SECTION | I General




  VetBooks.ir  Davis, J.M., Giddings, J.C., 1985b. Statistical method for estimation of  Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R.C., et al., 1991. Matrix-assisted
                computer-based testing, and analysis of errors. Anal. Chem. 57,
                                                                  laser desorption ionization mass-spectrometry of biopolymers. Anal.
                2168 2177.
                                                                  Chem. 63, 1139A 1202A.
                number of components from single complex chromatograms: applica-
                tion to experimental chromatograms. Anal. Chem. 57, 2178 2182.  Hopfgartner, G., Varesio, E., Tscha ¨ppa ¨t, V., et al., 2004. Triple quadru-
                                                                  pole linear ion trap mass spectrometer for the analysis of small
             Di Palma, S., Boersema, P.J., Heck, A.J., et al., 2011. Zwitterionic  molecules and macromolecules. J. Mass Spectrom. 39, 845 855.
                hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (ZIC-HILIC and ZIC-  Hu, Q., Noll, R.J., Li, H., et al., 2005. The orbitrap: a new mass spec-
                cHILIC) provide high resolution separation and increase sensitivity  trometer. J. Mass Spectrom. 40, 430 433.
                in proteome analysis. Anal. Chem. 83 (21), 8352 8356.  Huang, Q.Y., Huang, L., Huang, H.Q., 2011. Proteomic analysis of
             Eng, J.K., McCormack, A.L., Yates, J.R., 1994. An approach to correlate  methyl parathion-responsive proteins in zebrafish (Danio rerio)
                tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in  brain. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C. 153, 67 74.
                a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976 989.  Issaq, H.J., Chan, K.C., Janini, G.M., et al., 2005. Multidimensional sep-
             Espina, V., Woodhouse, E.C., Wulfkuhle, J., et al., 2004. Protein micro-  aration of peptides for effective proteomic analysis. J. Chromatogr.
                array detection strategies: focus on direct detection technologies. J.  B. 817, 35 47.
                Immunol. Methods. 290, 121 133.                 Ji, J., Chakraborty, A., Geng, M., et al., 2000. Strategy for qualitative
             Fenn, J.B., Mann, M., Meng, C.K., et al., 1989. Electrospray ionization  and quantitative analysis in proteomics based on signature peptides.
                for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science. 246, 64 71.  J. Chromatrogr. B. 745, 97 210.
             Gandar, A., Laffaille, P., Marty-Gasset, N., et al., 2017. Proteome  Jungo, F., Bairoch, A., 2005. Tox-Prot, the toxin protein annotation program
                response of fish under multiple stress exposure: Effects of pesticide  of the Swiss-Prot protein knowledgebase. Toxicon. 45, 293 301.
                mixtures and temperature increase. Aquat. Toxicol. 184, 61 77.  Kapp, E.A., Schu ¨tz, F., Connolly, L.M., et al., 2005. An evaluation, com-
             Gao, Y., Cao, Z., Yang, X., et al., 2017. Proteomic analysis of  parison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available
                acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity and identification of heme  MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity analysis.
                oxygenase 1 as a potential plasma biomarker of liver injury.  Proteomics. 5, 3475 3490.
                Proteomics Clin. Appl. 11, 1 17.                Karas, M., Hillenkamp, F., 1988. Laser desorption ionization of proteins
             Gerber, S.A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., et al., 2003. Absolute quantification  with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltons. Anal. Chem. 60,
                of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS.  2299 2301.
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100 (12), 6940 6945.     Kawahashi, Y., Doi, N., Takashima, H., et al., 2003. In vitro protein
             Gnad, F., Gunawardena, J., Mann, M., 2011. PHOSIDA 2011: the post-  microarrays for detecting protein-protein interactions: application of
                translational modification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 39,  a new method for fluorescence labeling of proteins. Proteomics. 3,
                D253 D260.                                        1236 1243.
             Goetz, H., Kuschel, M., Wulff, T., et al., 2004. Comparison of selected  Kearney, P., Thibault, P., 2003. Bioinformatics meets proteomics
                analytical techniques for protein sizing, quantitation and molecular  bridging the gap between mass spectrometry data analysis and cell
                weight determination. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 60, 281 293.  biology. J. Bioinform. Comp. Biol. 1 (1), 183 200.
             Goheen, S.C., Gibbins, B.M., 2000. Protein losses in ion-exchange chro-  Kennedy, S., 2002. The role of proteomics in toxicology: identification
                matography and hydrophobic interaction high-performance liquid  of  biomarkers  of  toxicity  by  protein  expression  analysis.
                chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 890, 73 80.     Biomarkers. 7 (4), 269 290.
             Go ¨rg, A., Obermaier, C., Boguth, G., et al., 2000. The current state of  Kumble, K.D., 2003. Protein microarrays: new tools for pharmaceutical
                two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients.  development. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 377, 812 819.
                Electrophoresis. 21, 1037 1053.                 Kuramitsu, Y., Hayashi, E., Okada, F., et al., 2010. Staining with highly
             Go ¨rg, A., Weiss, W., Dunn, W.J., 2004. Current two-dimensional elec-  sensitive Coomassie brilliant blue SeePicot stain after Flamingot
                trophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics. 4, 3665 3685.  fluorescent gel stain is useful for cancer proteomic analysis by
             Guerreiro, N., Staedtler, F., Grenet, O., et al., 2003. Toxicogenomics in  means of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Anticancer Res. 30
                drug development. Toxicol. Pathol. 31, 471 479.   (10), 4001 4005.
             Guo, B., Chen, Z.Y., Lee, R.D., et al., 2008. Drought stress and prehar-  Laughlin, B.C., Mulligan, C.C., Cooks, R.G., 2005. Atmospheric pres-
                vest aflatoxin contamination in agricultural commodity: genetics,  sure ionization in a miniature mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 77,
                genomics and proteomics. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 50 (10), 1281 1291.  2928 2939.
             Gygi, S.P., Rochon, Y., Franza, B.R., et al., 1999a. Correlation between  Levison, P.R., 2003. Large-scale ion exchange column chromatography
                protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 19 (3),  of proteins comparison of different formats. J. Chromatogr. B. 790,
                1720 1730.                                        7 33.
             Gygi, S.P., Rist, B., Gerber, S.A., et al., 1999b. Quantitative analysis of  Lina, Y., Shujuan, G., Yang, L., et al., 2011. Protein microarrays for sys-
                complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat.  tems biology. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 43 (3), 161 171.
                Biotechnol. 17, 994 999.                        Lopez, M.F., Berggren, K., Chernokalskaya, E., et al., 2000. A compari-
             Hamdan, M., Righetti, P.G., 2002. Modern strategies for protein quantifi-  son of silver stain and SYPRO Ruby Protein Gel Stain with respect
                cation in proteome analysis: advantages and limitations. Mass.  to protein detection in two-dimensional gels and identification by
                Spectrom. Rev. 21, 287 302.                       peptide mass profiling. Electrophoresis. 21, 3673 3683.
             Hayes, C.A., Karlsson, N.G., Struwe, W.B., et al., 2011. UniCarb-DB: a  Low, T.Y., Leow, C.K., Salto-Tellez, M., et al., 2004. A proteomic anal-
                database resource for glycomic discovery. Bioinformatics. 27 (9),  ysis of thioacetamide-induced hepatotoxicity and cirrhosis in rat
                1343 1344.                                        livers. Proteomics. 4, 3960 3974.
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208