Page 133 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 133

emphasis on the common good can often result in pressure on oppressed or disadvantaged groups

               to suspend their demands for justice. Although deliberation is meant to be guided by notions of


               the common good, it is hard to see how the common good is achieved when deliberation fails to

               meet the needs of an entire social group. As Jane Mansbridge explains, when we rule out claims


               of self-interest it becomes difficult for participants to truly understand the proceeding, and "the

               less powerful may not find ways to discover the prevailing sense of "we" does not adequately


               include them." While addressing the forms of internal exclusion described above is undoubtedly

               vital to the legitimacy of democratic procedures, threats to this legitimacy may remain even if


               participants respect all styles of communication, do not suppress minority concerns in pursuit of

               the common good, and all have the same opportunities to speak.


                       Two strands of feminist writing illuminate the  debate on deliberative democracy. One


               strand,  which  celebrates  women's  greater  nurturance,  modifies  and  enriches  the  deliberative


               framework by providing images and models of practice from women's experience. In this view,

               women's  socialization  and  role  in  childrearing,  among  other  causes,  makes  them  especially

               concerned to transform "I" into "we" and to seek solutions to conflict that accommodate diverse


               and often suppressed desires. More than men, women build their identities through relationships

               with  friends. Feminist writers propose this  capacity for broader self-definition  as  a model for


               democratic politics. (American Prospect, Spring 1990)


               Social Issues Dialogue



                       When I began my research, it focused on the power of dialogue and the intent of the design

               for data gathering and subsequent analysis was to focus solely on deliberative process, rather than

               the topic and subject of the civic engagement sessions. During the early stages of my research, I


               presumed that research into the experiences of self-discovery would bring forth an epiphany of

                                                             114
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138