Page 131 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 131

definition of deliberation is derived from “the literature of deliberative democracy boiled down to

               its basics of (1) discussions (2) about what to do (3) using reason(s)” (p. 88).



                       Similarly,  Young  (1996)  and  Sanders  (1997)  contended  that  emphasis  on  the  rational

               aspects of communication in the process of public engagement and deliberative process advocates


               a form of communication that, in addition to being formal, is orderly, contained, and dispassionate.

               Relative  to  this  debate,  Hall  (2007)  argued  that  the  valuing  of  dispassion  in  the  delivery  of


               deliberative  discourse,  derived  from  theories  of  communicative  discourse,  intensifies  existing

               inequalities of gender, race, and class.  The most severe critique of the capacity of deliberative


               procedures to contain ‘power-over’ has come from those outside of the process. One of the key

               concerns  is  that  deliberative  procedures  cannot  neutralize  ‘power-over’  since  we  all  possess

               different capacities to reason. Some authors I read contend that formal styles of deliberation have


               an inherent communicative bias which privileges those more equipped and accustomed to rational


               debate, such as better educated, middle-class, white males (Sanders, 1997; Young, 2001).


                       Although Hall (2007) successfully made the case that passion is a legitimate and important

               part of deliberation, defining passion as “strong enthusiasm and devotion” (p. 87) and exploring


               and expanding upon passion in deliberative settings, she has neglected to explore what occurs

               when passions collide or when rational and passionate forms of communication are present in


               dialogue settings. Hall’s (2007) research concludes with the recognition that civic dialogue and

               “deliberation requires both thinking carefully and caring thoughtfully” (p. 92).



                       Drawing from Hall, this dissertation must acknowledge the significance of emotion in the

               dialogue  experience,  while  also  identifying  the  exploration  of  passion  which  can  come  up

               enthusiastically in spurred dialogue moments relate these experiences are an area for further study.





                                                             112
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136