Page 141 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6

alternative viewpoints. Mass Trance comes to a climax when actively suppressing dissenting

viewpoints, and by isolating MORB-ID states protecting it from outside influences. MORB exists

in the Mass Trance due to the non-recognition that its identity lives within internal dialogue (ID).

In the social sciences, a social group has been defined as two or more people who interact

with one another, share similar characteristics, and collectively have a sense of unity. Other

theorists disagree however and are wary of definitions which stress the importance of

interdependence or objective similarity. (Turner, 1982; Platow, Grace, & Smithson, 2011) Instead,

researchers within the social identity tradition generally define it as "a group is defined in terms of

those who identify themselves as members of the group". (Reicher, 1982) Regardless, social

groups come in a myriad of sizes and varieties. For example, a society can be viewed as a large

social group and within it a plethora of others by various definitions so why not MORBs?

The societal context of residing comfortably or numbly within the Mass Trance requires

individuals to avoid ‘rocking the boat’ by raising controversial issues or alternative solutions, and

therefore this tapestry of social fabric results in a loss of individual creativity, distinguishing facts

and independent thinking. When MORB is worn out from the daily stresses of life and overworked

and unable to ‘win the rat race’ impoverished media distractions may further indulge conformist

safe-wishful thinking furthering the Mass Trance ideology by ‘alluding’ blame to outer fallacies.

It isn’t a populace living in ‘illusion’ but ‘Allusion’ to what is perceived out there beyond grasp.

The dysfunctional aspect of Mass Trance dynamics reveals that the "ingroup" produces an

"allusion of invulnerability" (an inflated certainty that the right decision has been made) which

perhaps forms the complacent crux of perpetual Mass Trance. MORB thinks through its perceived

association that the "ingroup" has their best interest significantly overrates its own abilities in

knowing what is considered ‘right’ and underrates the abilities of its opponents (the "outgroup").

122