Page 373 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 373

Conversely, there was no hesitance among an African American man to voice his desire to

               rush to scale by identifying a project that could begin to address the ills of the racial divide present


               in the community, rather than letting the deliberative dialogue process dictate the outcome. His

               approach to addressing issues of race and discrimination acknowledged the need to partner with


               members of the privileged sector of the community, but did not include, nor value the dialogue

               approach. His initial criticism of the dialogue process ranged from “I am more interested in solving


               problems  as  opposed  to  discussing  them”  to  “Through  all  the  discussion,  which  in  my  mind

               focused more on the history of race, rather than solving problems. It seems like we, there was


               nothing at that point that was bringing us together, which I regretted”. By the second series of

               dialogues this man indicated his understanding of the value of dialogue by commenting that “we


               talked about how we experienced that [type of racism] in our day is valuable in building authentic

               coalitions  because  both  parties  has  expressed  his  or  feelings  about  race  and  racism  openly”

               (P10MTRM).  As  the  dialogues  progressed  and  more  stories  were  shared  the  act  of  listening


               allowed privileged members of the group to hear and get in touch with the perspectives of those

               less privileged and temporarily relinquish the role of knower for that of listener (Pease, 2010).



                       The evolving character of the space within dialogues devoted to the topic of race lends

               particular insight into the possibility of mending the racial divide that exists and furthering theories


               of civic and deliberative dialogue as an approach that can have lasting and positive outcomes. The

               conversations during the first dialogue session (CC 2) were different from the conversations that


               occurred during the third and fourth CC dialogues. Over the scheduled meeting period the topics

               of conversation moved from stories and experiences of implicit bias as the original theme to racial

               injustice and community practices that perpetuated racism to a focus on next steps and action.







                                                             354
   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378