Page 375 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 375

Because  of  a  general  bias  toward  traditional  forms  of  gathering  and  interacting,  the

               conveners of the Albany event and two dialogue facilitators in particular were careful to educate


               participants about the purpose this series of Community Conversations pointing out the differences

               and distinctions between ‘bar talk’, debate and unfocused discussion. Grounding the practice of


               having Community Conversations in a way that educated participants about differences in relating,

               deliberative dialogue and debate served to position the sessions in the context of research (Gerzon,


               2006; Mansbridge, 1999; Walsh, 2007) while lending credibility to the purpose of holding them.


                       While deliberative theorists assert the need for reciprocity and mutual respect to counter


               disagreement in deliberative settings (Gutmann & Thompson, 2004), neither are antidotes to the

               emergence of tension, discomfort or disagreement in the course of civic and deliberative dialogue.

               While civic dialogue groups gather to discuss issues agreed upon topics they do so with the ideals


               of reciprocity and mutual respect from a procedural perspective, invariably however, differences


               of opinion tend to create tension.  As such, I observed at each of the Albany sessions moments

               when  there  were  tense  or  terse  moments  that  emerged  from  comments  made,  stories  told,  in

               addition to the imagery and commentary displayed in scenes from the videos shown and when the


               moderator lectured. Outward displays of tension were observed through body language in response

               to some of the stories shared. On the sidelines I could see a couple faces grimace during a portion


               of the dialogue.  During two separate CC meeting sessions, an older participant told of a time when

               an area skating rink set aside a certain day of the week for a Black skate. The designated Black


               skate night was the “only time people of color could enter the rink”. The second time her story

               added that after the Black skate day started a near-by ice cream shop often frequented by patrons

               of  the  skating  rink  decided  it  would  close  on  the  evening  of  the  Black  skate.  Her  admission


               reflected a real life confirmation that past racism existed and how it occurred in the community.



                                                             356
   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380