Page 371 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 371

Creating a Metasphere that is welcoming and safe is fundamental to sincere and productive

               exchanges. The four scheduled dialogues hosted by the City of Albany were convened at different


               locations. Their intent in hosting dialogues at multiple locations was to attract a widely diverse

               group of attendees. The dialogue space represents a place of public and personal interactions and


               expressions. The space occupied by the individuals who join in dialogue represented a mini-public

               of the local community joining in the public sphere to embark upon a type of discussion rarely


               encountered. A mini-public is a gathering of representatives of the local area that are modest in

               scale and modest in their aims (Fung, 2007). As such, examining how the community centers


               around Albany NY functioned as dialogue spaces for the Community Conversation series also

               became the subject of my research, what created Metasphere included the physical environment


               and the experiences of facilitators/participants; both in and away from the dialogue meeting space.


                       As Fung (2007) informed, the public sphere is a place where “individuals can reach their


               own considered views and gain confidence in their own perspectives” (p. 163). While participants

               in deliberative and civic dialogue can find space for equal expression and voice, it is achieved only

               through partnerships created among the participants and facilitators. The manner in which space


               is  formed  lays  the  foundation  for  how  participants  respond  to  tensions,  disagreements  and

               discomfort.  The  same  space  where  tension  grows  can  support  healing  resulting  from


               transformation that can occur during or at a point after the dialogue ends. Part process and part

               respect  for  those  who  join  together  in  process,  the  dialogue  space  is  dynamic  and  constantly


               evolving as the conversation ensues.


                       I observed during some of dialogues that tension producing comments and disagreements


               among dialogue participants were addressed only indirectly or not at all. Comments made by White

               male participants about “nature favoring the hybrid (people of bi-racial or multi-racial heritage)


                                                             352
   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376