Page 39 - Life Insurance Today June 2015 SAMPLE
P. 39
allocation
charges - con- Complaints began to be filed with
the regulator, insurance ombuds-
tinue to be as man and consumer courts on how
several investors were duped of
high as 35-40 crores by clever agents out to
make a quick buck
per cent.
In April 2010, markets regulator
Though things Securities and Exchange Board of
India (Sebi), under chairman C B
are much bet- Bhave, banned 14 life insurers
from raising money without its
ter than the permission
earlier phase, Sebi-Irda entered into a tussle to
control Ulips. The government
buyers should ended the turf war in June 2010
through an ordinance declaring
look at these Ulips will be regulated by Irda
products from In September 2010, Irda issued
stringent guidelines cutting down
the perspective commissions significantly and in-
creased disclosures and increased
that they are the minimum lock-in to five years.
buying a Sales immediately took a big
plunge since distributors did not
bundled prod- have any incentive to sell. Ulip
portfolios of insurers dipped to 20-
uct, which is un- 30 per cent due to increase in
redemptions by policyholders as
in equities. In case of policies in which desirable. well
the debt component is 60 per cent,
the maximum amount that can be HISTORY OF ULIPS In 2013, guidelines for linked prod-
borrowed is 50 per cent. In case of The first unit-linked insurance ucts was again modified, reducing
mutual funds, it is slightly higher at 50 plan was launched by Unit Trust of the net yields apart from linking
per cent. India, a mutual fund house, in commissions to tenure of the
1971 product, with higher tenure prod-
The comeback of Ulips has to be seen ucts giving ability to an agent to
from the context that it was heavily Private life insurers entered the earn higher commissions
mis-sold in the late 2000s. To go back insurance sector in 2000
into the past, unit-linked plans had With stock markets rising, Ulips
become a cause of concern for the The Insurance Regulatory and De- have started making a comeback,
customer due to the high charges lev- velopment Authority (Irda) came mostly through the online route.
ied by insurance companies, some- out with detailed guidelines for (Source : BS)
times even more than 110 per cent of Ulips in 2005
the first-year's premium.
Due to higher commissions, many
This led to excessive mis-selling by agents sold it aggressively during
agents who did not disclose the com- 2005-2008, when the stock mar-
mission. This invited regulator Insur- ket was rising consistently. Share
ance Regulatory and Development of Ulips almost went up to 70-80
Authority (Irda)'s wrath and new per cent in companies
guidelines were introduced in 2010. As
there was no incentive for distribu- In 2008, when the market
tors, Ulip sales saw a sharp drop. In- crashed, customers realised that
surance experts said while overall instead of doubling their money in
charges in Ulips have come down since three years, they were reduced to
September 2010, other charges - in- half or even less due to high front
cluding mortality charges, premium loading
Left to ourselves, we might pick the wrong health insurance, the wrong mortgage, the wrong school for our kids; why, unless they stop
us, we might pick the wrong light bulb.
Life Insurance Today June 2015 35
Insurance Training Centre © Call 09883398055 / 09883380339