Page 29 - Life Insurance Today December 2017
P. 29

Findings : Sr. Divisional Manager, Ludhiana confirmed that  The life assured went missing after he set out for fishing
         both the cheques were credited in LIC account on     in a boat with other fisherman at 7.00 AM on 6.8.2002
         3.6.2002. However, proposal forms were not submitted.  when the boat capsized 30 meters from the seashore and
         The depositor had died on 13.7.02, but no intimation was  the life assured was injured. The fellow fisherman made
         given to the office. The consideration amount was    good escape and the life assured's body was washed
         deposited through the agent Shri B.P. Sood, who confirmed  ashore on 10.8.2002 at 12.45 PM in a highly decomposed
         non receipt of proposal forms from LA despite repeated  state. LIC repudiated the claim on the plea that the
         reminders. It was stated that the deposit amount would  premium due was paid after the death of the life assured,
         be refunded to class-I legal heirs of Shri Rawat on  as otherwise policy was in a lapsed condition and nothing
         completion of formalities. The death claim was not payable  was payable thereunder. LIC however refunded the
         in view of the fact that insurance contract had not been  premium of Rs. 896/- paid after the death of the life
         finalized.                                           assured. The complainant has approached Zonal Claims
                                                              Review Committee who upheld the repudiation decision.
         On behalf of complainant it was stated that two policies
         were proposed by late Shri Subhash Dawar for SA of Rs.  The parties to the dispute were heard and the records of
         10 lacs. After getting the cheques, the agent did not bother  the case perused. F.I.R., Policy Inquest Report, Death
         to contact him again to get the proposal forms filled up.  Certificate and Postmortem report did not throw any light
         The agent stated in his report that he tried to contact the  on the time of death. The Post - Mortem Report stated
         proposer to have the proposal forms filled up. But when  that the death was due to drowning, that there were cut
         he was informed by late Shri Subhash Dawar that he was  injuries on his body and the body was in a highly
         having heart problem and was being treated at DMC, he  decomposed state. The Death Certificate recorded the
         refused the proposal and advised him to get the refund  date of death as 6.8.2002, on which the Insurer greatly
         from office. Besides, the claim was lodged two years after  relied upon to repudiate surmising that the life assured
         the death of Shri Subhash Dawar.                     met with instantaneous death on capsize of the boat. But
                                                              the exact time of death was not ascertainable from the
         Decision : Held that it was evident that, for whatever  Death Certificate. It was probable that since the liffe
         reasons, contract between the parties was not effected.  assured was a fisherman by profession, he could have tried
         Therefore, the basis for admitting the claim does not exist.  to save himself and could have been alive even after his
         The complainant also failed to explain why the claim was  injuries. It was also probable that the life assured met with
         lodged after two years and intimation about his death was  instantaneous death on drowning since the life assured
         not given earlier. The obvious inference is that it is an after  reportedly suffered injuries when the boat capsized.
         thought. Hence the complaint was dismissed.          Therefore the claim of the complainant for full sum
                                                              assured could not be considered and LIC was directed to
                Chennai Ombudsman Centre                      pay the basic sum assured of Rs. 53,000/- on Ex-gratia
                                                              basis. The complaint was partly allowed.
             Case No. IO (CHN) / 21.07.2247 / 2004 - 05

                         Smt. M. Jeramma                             Chennai Ombudsman Centre
                                 Vs.                             Case No. IO (CHN) / 21.08.2463 / 2004 - 05

                Life Insurance Corporation of India                         Smt. G. Kotteswaran

                                                                                     Vs.
         Late S. Michealdas, a fisherman, took a policy of insurance
         on his life with LIC for a sum assured of Rs. 53,000/- on  Life Insurance Corporation of India
         15.11.2000 and nominated his wife Smt. M. Jeramma
         thereunder. The policy lapsed due to non-payament of  Smt. K. Tamilselvi took a LIC policy for Rs. 50,000/- on
         premium due from 15.5.2002. The premium under the    28.12.2002. She nominated her husband Shri G.
         policy was paid to LIC at 11.17 hours on 6.8.2002 along  Kotteswaran under the policy. She died on 5.2.2004 due
         with late fee.                                       to heart atttack. The claim was repudiated for suppression

         Life Insurance Today                        December 2017                                            29







                      Sashi Publications Pvt Ltd Call 8443808873/ 8232083010
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34