Page 30 - Life Insurance Today December 2017
P. 30

of pre-proposal illhealth. Documents perused and parties  and after careful consideration of the facts of the case, I
         heard. The complainant accepted that his wife had    am of the view that LIC has no valid ground for repudiating
         undergone hospitalisation and surgery prior to proposing  the claim of the complainant. The reason for repudiation
         for insurance, but contended that the same was within the  given in LIC's letter of repudiation dated 31.03.2004
         knowledge of the Agent who only filled up the proposal  addressed to the complainant is that in the proposal for
         form. The hospital records evidenced that the life assured  insurance which formed the basis for the Jeevan Rekha
         had history of Dyspnoea for several years, was diagnosed  policy taken by the life assured in March,2003, Policy
         as a case of Rheumatic Heart Disease and surgery     No.182405098, from which the present dispute has arisen,
         performed in 1997, 5 years prior to proposing for    he had not disclosed details of the policies taken by him
         insurance. The material information was not disclosed in  earlier.
         the proposal in the absence of which the Insurer could not
         assess the risk properly. Material suppression was proved  In my view, there is no substance in the ground taken by
         on the basis of irrefutable evidence on record and the  LIC in the said letter of repudiation. The proposer is not
         repudiation decision of the Insurer was upheld. Reliance  obliged to disclose information which is already in the
         was placed on the decision of National Commission in LIC  knowledge of LIC. LIC should know what policies the life
         of India vs Gowri & Ors in F.A.No. 1993 NC that Agent  assured had taken earlier.
         while filling up the proposal from acts the Agent of the
         insured and not of the Insurer.                      Evidently, LIC has no information system by means of
                                                              which this information can be readily retrieved. However,
         The Complaint dismissed.                             this is no excuse for LIC abdicating its own responsibility
                                                              in the matter. What LIC is saying, in effect is this; "We have
                  Delhi Ombudsman Centre                      the information about your earlier policies.

                        Case No. LI - JD / 57                 However, we cannot get this information quickly. We have
                          Smt. Annapurna                      neither the time nor the inclination to gather this
                                                              information. We shall, therefore, hold you responsible for
                                 Vs                           any omission". This is not a responsible attitude on the
                Life Insurance Corporation of India           part of LIC.

                                                              It is the duty of every prudent insurer to verify all the
         Facts of the case : Smt. Annapurna filed a complaint before
                                                              information given by the proposer in the proposal form,
         this Forum. Her complant was against LIC of India,
         Divisional Office, Jodhpur. Her husband late Shri Hemant  even if the means of verification are difficult. Information
                                                              relating to earlier policies taken is certainly very important,
         Kumar Trivedi has taken a policy No.182405098 for sum
                                                              specially for determining the risk that LIC is assuming. LIC
         assured of Rs. 2,00,000 on 28.03.2003.
                                                              certainly cannot rely on the principle of utmost good faith
         Before taking this policy, he was also having another policy  in this case. It should verify the information. If the means
                                                              of verification are difficult then LIC should obtain a
         No. 101157837 for Rs. 3,00,000 taken on 28.12.2001
         which was in lapsed condition on 28.03.2003. He has not  separate affidavit in this matter from the proposer.
         mentioned the above policy in the proposal form while
         taking the Policy No. 182405098. The life Insurance  Now that the worst has happened to the life assured, LIC
                                                              is merely ,trying to evade its liability by finding fault with
         corporation of India repudiated the claim on the grounds
         of nondisclosure of this fact. Hence, this complaint to this  the proposal form. This is not acceptable. In the result,
         forum.                                               therefore, Honourable Insurance Ombudsman passed the
                                                              Award that Life Insurance Corporation of India shall pay
         Observations & Decision : After hearing both the parties  to Smt. Annapurna, the mother of the life assured and the


                           “In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure.”


          30                                         December 2017                            Life Insurance Today







                      Sashi Publications Pvt Ltd Call 8443808873/ 8232083010
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35