Page 33 - Insurance Times June 2024
P. 33

be permitted to sail out of the port of Vishakhapatnam. In  itself was placed before the Bench of the learned Chief
         case the execution petition ultimately succeeds on merits  Justice wherein upon recording concurrence as regards
         against the appellant it will be open to Respondent No.1  the maintainability of the petition it was observed that
         decree-holder to encash the Bank Guarantee amount       the Execution Petition be heard on merits and hence
         towards its claim in the execution proceedings. Subject to the  the Special Leave Petition (SLP) before this Court under
         aforesaid modification both the appeals stand dismissed with  Article 136 of the Constitution being SLP(C) No. 4410 of
         no order as to costs in each of them”. the court asserted.  2000.  (17.08.2000).  Lastly,  both  the  SLPs  were
                                                                 dismissed by the learned court.
         Thus, the dismissal of the appeal would not prevent M.V. A
         L  Quamar to obtain release of the attached ship on  Maritime liens are unique as they view the vessel as a legal
         furnishing a bank guarantee of a nationalised bank for  entity apart from its ownership. Although the ship is
         suitable amount to the satisfaction of the Registrar of the  considered guilty in case of an accident, the vessel owner
                                                              must represent the vessel in all legal proceedings. Thus, they
         Andhra  Pradesh  High  Court,  pending  the  execution
                                                              must repatriate, re-compensate, or suitably comply with the
         proceedings. "Once such Bank guarantee is furnished by the  regulations of the admiralty court “on behalf” of the vessel.
         appellant and requisite undertakings as earlier ordered by
         the High Court are filed, the ship will be released from
         attachment and will be permitted to sail out of the Port of
         Vishakhapatnam," the court ordered.


         Chronology:
         1. It was held by that Court that respondent No. 2 was
             liable in the sum of US $265,000 together with interest
             @ 9.51% p.a. from 01.06.1994.
         2. Respondent No. 2 is alleged to have sold the said vessel
             for US $ 2,515,000 by a Memorandum of Agreement
             dated 04.02.1997. (Quamar Shipping Ltd.)
         3. Ex-parte and a decree for damages for breach of salvage
                                                              *I  am  thankful  to  Dr.S.Mukherjee,  an  Expert  and
             contract was passed by the English Court on 02.11.1998
                                                              International Investigator for Maritime Fraud for his advice
         4. The learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High
             Court on 15th September, 1999 granted an interim  Dr.Soumi Mukherjee completed her Graduation in Mass
             order as prayed for on a prima facieview of the matter  Media and Masters in Mass Media from University of
             that the Execution Petition can be filed in the High  Mumbai, later completed her Ph.d. She is interested in
             Courtwhich is otherwise having original admiralty  Investigative Journalism related with History, Geography,
             jurisdiction.                                     Zoology etc. She is currently serving in Media Officer
                                                               with International Police Organization.
         5. In terms of the order as above, the Execution Petition





           Come June 1, the government will converge two insurance schemes for fishermen, which might help in reducing the
           premium burden and easing implementation issues, sources said. Sources have revealed that for the fishermen insurance
           scheme under the Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (PMSBY) and the Group Accident Insurance Scheme (GAIS)
           will be converged to provide comprehensive insurance coverage of Rs 5 lakh for fishermen (Rs 3 lakh under GAIS for
           accidental death or permanent total disability and Rs 2 lakh under PMSBY). Until now, sources have indicated that
           coverage of Rs 2 lakh was offered under PMSBY, while coverage of Rs 5 lakh was provided under GAIS.
           For GAIS, a premium of Rs 91 per fisherman per year was calculated based on the last available data, while under
           PMSBY, a premium of Rs 20 per fisherman was calculated, sources said. As a fully subsidised scheme, fishermen are
           not required to pay any premium, with the entire burden borne by the government.


                                                                           The Insurance Times  June 2024     31
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38